Advertisement
BCC vs USLM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Boise Cascade Company (BCC) vs. United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both BCC and USLM operate in the basic materials sector with exposure to construction and building products, but BCC focuses on wood products and distribution while USLM specializes in lime and limestone.
- BCC offers larger scale with $6.4 billion in trailing twelve months (TTM) revenue compared to USLM's $373 million, but trails in profitability metrics.
- USLM demonstrates stronger return on equity (ROE, a measure of profitability relative to shareholders' equity) at 23.8% versus BCC's 6.3%, supported by positive quarterly revenue growth of 9.8%.
- Year-to-date (YTD), USLM has shown slightly stronger gains around 10-12% compared to BCC's 7-8%, though both lag broader market benchmarks in the one-year view.
- USLM maintains minimal debt/equity at 0.6% versus BCC's 25%, offering lower balance sheet risk.
- Recent market activity highlights volatility for USLM following quarterly results, while BCC approaches upcoming earnings with stable momentum.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines BCC and USLM, two players in the basic materials sector tied to construction and infrastructure demand. Investors tracking building products and materials may find value in contrasting their scale, profitability, and market positioning amid fluctuating housing and industrial activity. Traders focused on relative performance could assess momentum shifts and valuation trade-offs in recent market conditions. Both stocks offer exposure to cyclical sectors, making this analysis relevant for those evaluating sector rotation or diversification strategies.
BCC Overview and Recent Performance
Boise Cascade Company (BCC) manufactures engineered wood products like plywood and laminated veneer lumber, while distributing building materials through its wholesale network across the U.S. and Canada. In recent market activity, BCC shares have traded within a 52-week range of approximately $65 to $98, reflecting sensitivity to lumber prices and housing starts. YTD gains hover around 8%, supported by steady demand in repair/remodel segments despite softer new construction. Sentiment remains influenced by broader economic indicators like interest rates and inventory levels, with upcoming quarterly earnings anticipated to shed light on margin pressures from recent revenue softening. Valuation metrics include a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 22 and market cap near $2.8 billion.
USLM Overview and Recent Performance
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM) produces lime and limestone products from quarries, serving construction, industrial, environmental, and steel sectors. Recent weeks have seen heightened volatility, with shares dropping sharply post-quarterly results announcement despite reported revenue of $88 million and strong earnings. Trading in a 52-week band of $91 to $141, USLM has delivered YTD returns around 10-12%, outperforming BCC amid robust demand for its specialized products. Key drivers include infrastructure spending and low-debt structure, though market reactions highlight sensitivity to earnings beats or misses. P/E stands at about 23-27, with market cap around $3 billion.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features over 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from more than 350 available models that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies, timeframes (from 5-minute to 60-minute charts), and themes like semiconductors, small caps, and industrials, showcasing impressive stats such as annualized returns ranging from 24% to 164%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7. Equity charts and detailed metrics like profit-to-drawdown ratios (2.6 to 16.8) highlight their edge in volatile conditions. Explore these bots to potentially enhance your trading with data-driven signals tailored to current markets.
Head-to-Head Comparison
BCC’s integrated manufacturing and distribution model provides scale advantages in wood products, contrasting USLM’s niche focus on lime processing for specialized applications. Growth drivers differ: BCC faces headwinds from negative quarterly revenue growth (-6.8%), while USLM benefits from 9.8% expansion tied to infrastructure. Recent momentum favors USLM YTD, but its elevated price-to-sales ratio (9.9 vs. 0.5) signals premium pricing versus BCC’s value tilt. Risk profiles highlight USLM’s near-debt-free balance sheet against BCC’s moderate leverage. Market sentiment reflects construction cyclicality for both, with USLM showing higher ROE but greater short-term swings.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models would likely favor USLM in the current environment due to its superior ROE, positive revenue momentum, and minimal debt, positioning it better for sustained profitability amid sector recovery. BCC offers attractive valuations but lags in growth consistency. This assessment weighs trend stability and catalysts probabilistically, not as a guarantee.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCC is a Buy and USLM is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BCC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUSLM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BCC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- USLM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BCC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USLM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BCC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- USLM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BCC (@Forest Products) experienced а +4.49% price change this week, while USLM (@Construction Materials) price change was +3.61% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Forest Products industry was -1.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.07%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +5.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.54%.
Reported Earning Dates
BCC is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.
USLM is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Forest Products (-1.50% weekly)Forest products are materials derived from forestry for direct consumption or commercial use. Wood, for example, has variety or uses ranging from generating wood fuel (e.g. in the form of firewood or charcoal) to providing structural materials for the construction of buildings and home improvement, or in the form of wood pulp that is used in the paper production. . Pulp and paper industry, in particular, creates high volume demand for the wood materials including both softwood and hardwood. Major companies making such products include Trex Company, Inc. (manufacturer of wood-alternative decking and railings), Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (makes engineered wood building products) and Universal Forest Products, Inc. (manufactures and distributes wood and wood-alternative products, pressure-treated wood, and is a solid-sawn lumber buyer; makes products for use in home improvement and construction industries).
@Construction Materials (+5.20% weekly)Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.
| BCC | USLM | BCC / USLM | |
| Capitalization | 2.5B | 3.11B | 81% |
| EBITDA | 337M | 179M | 188% |
| Gain YTD | -2.776 | -9.377 | 30% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.95 | 23.87 | 100% |
| Revenue | 6.37B | 369M | 1,725% |
| Total Cash | 339M | 383M | 89% |
| Total Debt | 540M | 3.63M | 14,892% |
BCC | USLM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 34 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 44 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 85 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | 51 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BCC's Valuation (17) in the Forest Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for USLM (70) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that BCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than USLM’s over the last 12 months.
USLM's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCC (84) in the Forest Products industry. This means that USLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCC’s over the last 12 months.
USLM's SMR Rating (43) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCC (85) in the Forest Products industry. This means that USLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCC’s over the last 12 months.
BCC's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Forest Products industry is in the same range as USLM (60) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that BCC’s stock grew similarly to USLM’s over the last 12 months.
BCC's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Forest Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for USLM (51) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that BCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than USLM’s over the last 12 months.
| BCC | USLM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 75% | 12 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 64% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FELV | 39.87 | 0.37 | +0.94% |
| Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF | |||
| XSHD | 13.91 | 0.09 | +0.65% |
| Invesco S&P SmallCap Hi Div Low Vol ETF | |||
| SEIE | 35.34 | 0.14 | +0.40% |
| SEI Select International Equity ETF | |||
| AMYY | 15.76 | 0.06 | +0.38% |
| Graniteshares YieldBOOST AMD ETF | |||
| HYBB | 46.67 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares BB Rated Corporate Bond ETF | |||
BCC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCC has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCC jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.
USLM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USLM has been loosely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if USLM jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To USLM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USLM | 100% | +2.30% | ||
| BCC - USLM | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| TTAM - USLM | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.67% | ||
| VMC - USLM | 33% Poorly correlated | +2.24% | ||
| EXP - USLM | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.83% | ||
| SMID - USLM | 31% Poorly correlated | +5.50% | ||
More | ||||