EXP
Price
$215.25
Change
-$1.81 (-0.83%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
6.66B
38 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
USLM
Price
$108.39
Change
+$2.44 (+2.30%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
3.11B
51 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EXP vs USLM

Header iconEXP vs USLM Comparison
Open Charts EXP vs USLMBanner chart's image
EXP vs USLM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EXP vs. USLM commentary
Jun 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXP is a Buy and USLM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2026
Stock price -- (EXP: $215.25 vs. USLM: $108.39)
Brand notoriety: EXP and USLM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EXP: 97% vs. USLM: 208%
Market capitalization -- EXP: $6.66B vs. USLM: $3.11B
EXP [@Construction Materials] is valued at $6.66B. USLM’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $3.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $71.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $13.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EXP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUSLM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EXP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • USLM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EXP is a better buy in the long-term than USLM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EXP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USLM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EXP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • USLM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, USLM is a better buy in the short-term than EXP.

Price Growth

EXP (@Construction Materials) experienced а +1.19% price change this week, while USLM (@Construction Materials) price change was +3.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +5.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

EXP is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

USLM is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+5.20% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EXP($6.66B) has a higher market cap than USLM($3.11B). USLM has higher P/E ratio than EXP: USLM (23.87) vs EXP (16.36). EXP YTD gains are higher at: 4.286 vs. USLM (-9.377). EXP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 759M vs. USLM (179M). USLM has more cash in the bank: 383M vs. EXP (298M). USLM has less debt than EXP: USLM (3.63M) vs EXP (1.8B). EXP has higher revenues than USLM: EXP (2.31B) vs USLM (369M).
EXPUSLMEXP / USLM
Capitalization6.66B3.11B214%
EBITDA759M179M424%
Gain YTD4.286-9.377-46%
P/E Ratio16.3623.8769%
Revenue2.31B369M626%
Total Cash298M383M78%
Total Debt1.8B3.63M49,559%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EXP vs USLM: Fundamental Ratings
EXP
USLM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8334
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7144
SMR RATING
1..100
3443
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4860
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4251
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EXP's Valuation (31) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for USLM (70). This means that EXP’s stock grew somewhat faster than USLM’s over the last 12 months.

USLM's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as EXP (71). This means that USLM’s stock grew similarly to EXP’s over the last 12 months.

EXP's SMR Rating (34) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as USLM (43). This means that EXP’s stock grew similarly to USLM’s over the last 12 months.

EXP's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as USLM (60). This means that EXP’s stock grew similarly to USLM’s over the last 12 months.

EXP's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as USLM (51). This means that EXP’s stock grew similarly to USLM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EXPUSLM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EXP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
USLM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIL.X0.7840910.036056
+4.82%
Filecoin cryptocurrency
SUSHI.X0.1752950.004190
+2.45%
SushiSwap cryptocurrency
SCRT.X0.0595530.000614
+1.04%
Secret cryptocurrency
OM.X0.008622-0.000084
-0.96%
MANTRA (old) cryptocurrency
NKN.X0.005598-0.000497
-8.16%
NKN cryptocurrency

USLM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USLM has been loosely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if USLM jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USLM
1D Price
Change %
USLM100%
+2.30%
BCC - USLM
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
TTAM - USLM
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
VMC - USLM
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.24%
EXP - USLM
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
SMID - USLM
31%
Poorly correlated
+5.50%
More