KWY
Price
$10.47
Change
+$0.04 (+0.38%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:05 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
298.57M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VRTS
Price
$141.74
Change
+$1.17 (+0.83%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
939.31M
31 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KWY vs VRTS

KWY vs VRTS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KWY vs. VRTS commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KWY is a Hold and VRTS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (KWY: $10.43 vs. VRTS: $140.57)
Brand notoriety: KWY and VRTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KWY: 97% vs. VRTS: 83%
Market capitalization -- KWY: $298.57M vs. VRTS: $939.31M
KWY [@Investment Managers] is valued at $298.57M. VRTS’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $939.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $163.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KWY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVRTS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KWY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VRTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both KWY and VRTS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KWY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRTS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KWY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VRTS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VRTS is a better buy in the short-term than KWY.

Price Growth

KWY (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.10% price change this week, while VRTS (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

VRTS is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.14% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VRTS($939M) has a higher market cap than KWY($299M). VRTS YTD gains are higher at: -11.090 vs. KWY (-22.454). VRTS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 389M vs. KWY (2.54M). VRTS has more cash in the bank: 273M vs. KWY (44.4M). KWY has less debt than VRTS: KWY (72.2M) vs VRTS (2.85B). VRTS has higher revenues than KWY: VRTS (829M) vs KWY (147M).
KWYVRTSKWY / VRTS
Capitalization299M939M32%
EBITDA2.54M389M1%
Gain YTD-22.454-11.090202%
P/E RatioN/A8.28-
Revenue147M829M18%
Total Cash44.4M273M16%
Total Debt72.2M2.85B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KWY vs VRTS: Fundamental Ratings
KWY
VRTS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1375
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
56100
SMR RATING
1..100
9963
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6053
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3172
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4750

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VRTS's Valuation (8) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KWY (69) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that VRTS’s stock grew somewhat faster than KWY’s over the last 12 months.

KWY's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VRTS (100) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that KWY’s stock grew somewhat faster than VRTS’s over the last 12 months.

VRTS's SMR Rating (63) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KWY (99) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that VRTS’s stock grew somewhat faster than KWY’s over the last 12 months.

VRTS's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as KWY (60) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that VRTS’s stock grew similarly to KWY’s over the last 12 months.

KWY's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VRTS (72) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that KWY’s stock grew somewhat faster than VRTS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KWYVRTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KWY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VRTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HASCX56.980.43
+0.76%
Harbor Small Cap Value Instl
FIMKX55.88N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Focused Em Mkts I
GGLIX14.64N/A
N/A
abrdn US Sustainable Leaders Instl
ALMZX32.45N/A
N/A
Alger MidCap Growth Institutional Z-2
MIDFX66.93N/A
N/A
Marsico Midcap Growth Focus Instl

KWY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWY has been loosely correlated with BEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KWY jumps, then BEN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KWY
1D Price
Change %
KWY100%
-1.14%
BEN - KWY
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.66%
FDUS - KWY
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.32%
BN - KWY
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
APAM - KWY
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
VRTS - KWY
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
More