L
Price
$91.66
Change
+$0.40 (+0.44%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
17.4B
9 days until earnings call
SAFT
Price
$70.70
Change
+$0.08 (+0.11%)
Updated
Jul 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.22B
4 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

L vs SAFT

Header iconL vs SAFT Comparison
Open Charts L vs SAFTBanner chart's image
Loews
Price$91.66
Change+$0.40 (+0.44%)
Volume$436.66K
Capitalization17.4B
Safety Insurance Group
Price$70.70
Change+$0.08 (+0.11%)
Volume$204
Capitalization1.22B
L vs SAFT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
L vs. SAFT commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is L is a Hold and SAFT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (L: $91.66 vs. SAFT: $70.77)
Brand notoriety: L and SAFT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: L: 52% vs. SAFT: 61%
Market capitalization -- L: $17.4B vs. SAFT: $1.22B
L [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $17.4B. SAFT’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $1.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

L’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSAFT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • L’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SAFT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the long-term than SAFT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

L’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAFT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • L’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SAFT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the short-term than SAFT.

Price Growth

L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.78% price change this week, while SAFT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -3.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

L is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

SAFT is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-0.25% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
L($17.4B) has a higher market cap than SAFT($1.22B). SAFT has higher P/E ratio than L: SAFT (63.23) vs L (12.32). L YTD gains are higher at: 8.386 vs. SAFT (-12.124). L has more cash in the bank: 45.2B vs. SAFT (518M). SAFT has less debt than L: SAFT (49.8M) vs L (9B). L has higher revenues than SAFT: L (15.7B) vs SAFT (926M).
LSAFTL / SAFT
Capitalization17.4B1.22B1,431%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.386-12.124-69%
P/E Ratio12.3263.2319%
Revenue15.7B926M1,695%
Total Cash45.2B518M8,726%
Total Debt9B49.8M18,078%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
L vs SAFT: Fundamental Ratings
L
SAFT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7754
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
767
SMR RATING
1..100
9875
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3381
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2491
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAFT's Valuation (16) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for L (71). This means that SAFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAFT (67). This means that L’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

SAFT's SMR Rating (75) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (98). This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (33) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAFT (81). This means that L’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

L's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for SAFT (91). This means that L’s stock grew significantly faster than SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LSAFT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTHI23.000.06
+0.26%
First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF
JULT42.540.08
+0.18%
AllianzIM US Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF
ZJAN26.520.01
+0.02%
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January
SPCX25.39N/A
N/A
SPAC and New Issue ETF
TBT36.53-0.45
-1.22%
ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury

SAFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAFT has been closely correlated with CNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAFT jumps, then CNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAFT
1D Price
Change %
SAFT100%
+0.21%
CNA - SAFT
69%
Closely correlated
+1.07%
HMN - SAFT
68%
Closely correlated
-1.79%
UFCS - SAFT
67%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
L - SAFT
67%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
CINF - SAFT
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.03%
More