Advertisement
L vs SAFT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is L is a Buy and SAFT is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
L’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSAFT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- L’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- SAFT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
L’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAFT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- L’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SAFT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +3.73% price change this week, while SAFT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -0.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.81%.
Reported Earning Dates
L is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.
SAFT is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.44% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| L | SAFT | L / SAFT | |
| Capitalization | 20.8B | 1.06B | 1,962% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.680 | -10.490 | -178% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.92 | 12.42 | 128% |
| Revenue | 17.8B | 1.19B | 1,495% |
| Total Cash | 6.51B | 611M | 1,065% |
| Total Debt | 8.95B | 43.7M | 20,474% |
L | SAFT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 65 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 70 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 24 | 76 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 17 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 27 | 42 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SAFT's Valuation (16) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for L (71). This means that SAFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than L’s over the last 12 months.
L's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAFT (65). This means that L’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAFT’s over the last 12 months.
SAFT's SMR Rating (70) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (97). This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.
L's Price Growth Rating (24) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAFT (76). This means that L’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAFT’s over the last 12 months.
L's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for SAFT (93). This means that L’s stock grew significantly faster than SAFT’s over the last 12 months.
| L | SAFT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 5 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 39% | 4 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 4 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 46% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 52% | 12 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 37% | 4 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 31% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 42% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LSAT | 41.58 | 0.29 | +0.71% |
| LeaderShares® AlphaFctr® Tctcl Fcsd ETF | |||
| CLM | 8.22 | 0.05 | +0.61% |
| Cornerstone Strategic Value Fund | |||
| GOOP | 32.28 | 0.03 | +0.10% |
| Kurv Yield Premium Str Google ETF | |||
| FOF | 12.87 | 0.01 | +0.08% |
| Cohen & Steers Closed End Opportunity Fund | |||
| TEMX | 29.02 | N/A | N/A |
| Touchstone Sands Cap EM ex-China Gr ETF | |||
SAFT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAFT has been closely correlated with UFCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAFT jumps, then UFCS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAFT | 100% | -0.01% | ||
| UFCS - SAFT | 71% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| HMN - SAFT | 69% Closely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| CNA - SAFT | 68% Closely correlated | +1.66% | ||
| CINF - SAFT | 67% Closely correlated | +1.61% | ||
| L - SAFT | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.29% | ||
More | ||||