L
Price
$96.64
Change
-$0.89 (-0.91%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
20.05B
58 days until earnings call
SAFT
Price
$72.58
Change
-$0.49 (-0.67%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.08B
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

L vs SAFT

Header iconL vs SAFT Comparison
Open Charts L vs SAFTBanner chart's image
Loews
Price$96.64
Change-$0.89 (-0.91%)
Volume$770.46K
Capitalization20.05B
Safety Insurance Group
Price$72.58
Change-$0.49 (-0.67%)
Volume$120.5K
Capitalization1.08B
L vs SAFT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
L vs. SAFT commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is L is a StrongBuy and SAFT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (L: $96.64 vs. SAFT: $72.58)
Brand notoriety: L and SAFT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: L: 102% vs. SAFT: 132%
Market capitalization -- L: $20.05B vs. SAFT: $1.08B
L [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $20.05B. SAFT’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $1.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $143B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

L’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSAFT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • L’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SAFT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the long-term than SAFT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

L’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAFT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • L’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SAFT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the short-term than SAFT.

Price Growth

L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.17% price change this week, while SAFT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -0.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

L is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

SAFT is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.22% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
L($20B) has a higher market cap than SAFT($1.08B). L has higher P/E ratio than SAFT: L (15.48) vs SAFT (12.67). L YTD gains are higher at: 14.349 vs. SAFT (-8.742). SAFT has less debt than L: SAFT (43.7M) vs L (8.95B). L has higher revenues than SAFT: L (17.8B) vs SAFT (1.19B).
LSAFTL / SAFT
Capitalization20B1.08B1,850%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.349-8.742-164%
P/E Ratio15.4812.67122%
Revenue17.8B1.19B1,495%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt8.95B43.7M20,471%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
L vs SAFT: Fundamental Ratings
L
SAFT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1579
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
773
SMR RATING
1..100
9770
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3160
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2594
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3350

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAFT's Valuation (15) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for L (69). This means that SAFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for SAFT (73). This means that L’s stock grew significantly faster than SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

SAFT's SMR Rating (70) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (97). This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (31) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as SAFT (60). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

L's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for SAFT (94). This means that L’s stock grew significantly faster than SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LSAFT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IPOYX21.820.14
+0.65%
Macquarie Systematic Em Mkts Eq Y
JCICX88.87N/A
N/A
JPMorgan U.S. GARP Equity C
JGINX78.31N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Growth And Income I
ADVGX14.95N/A
N/A
North Square Select Small Cap I
MENAX9.06N/A
N/A
Madison Covered Call & Equity Income A

SAFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAFT has been closely correlated with UFCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAFT jumps, then UFCS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAFT
1D Price
Change %
SAFT100%
-0.67%
UFCS - SAFT
70%
Closely correlated
-1.98%
HMN - SAFT
67%
Closely correlated
-1.45%
CNA - SAFT
66%
Closely correlated
-1.92%
CINF - SAFT
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.43%
L - SAFT
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
More