L
Price
$93.19
Change
-$0.89 (-0.95%)
Updated
Aug 7, 04:42 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
17.4B
88 days until earnings call
UFCS
Price
$28.84
Change
+$0.12 (+0.42%)
Updated
Aug 7, 10:54 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
550.29M
83 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

L vs UFCS

Header iconL vs UFCS Comparison
Open Charts L vs UFCSBanner chart's image
Loews
Price$93.19
Change-$0.89 (-0.95%)
Volume$282
Capitalization17.4B
United Fire Group
Price$28.84
Change+$0.12 (+0.42%)
Volume$100
Capitalization550.29M
L vs UFCS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UFCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
L vs. UFCS commentary
Aug 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is L is a Buy and UFCS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2025
Stock price -- (L: $94.08 vs. UFCS: $28.72)
Brand notoriety: L and UFCS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: L: 114% vs. UFCS: 173%
Market capitalization -- L: $17.4B vs. UFCS: $550.29M
L [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $17.4B. UFCS’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $550.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

L’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUFCS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • L’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • UFCS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the long-term than UFCS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

L’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UFCS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • L’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UFCS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the short-term than UFCS.

Price Growth

L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +4.20% price change this week, while UFCS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +7.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

L is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

UFCS is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.10% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
L($17.4B) has a higher market cap than UFCS($550M). UFCS has higher P/E ratio than L: UFCS (41.53) vs L (12.32). L YTD gains are higher at: 11.247 vs. UFCS (2.098). L has more cash in the bank: 45.2B vs. UFCS (102M). UFCS has less debt than L: UFCS (50M) vs L (9B). L has higher revenues than UFCS: L (15.7B) vs UFCS (1.1B).
LUFCSL / UFCS
Capitalization17.4B550M3,164%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.2472.098536%
P/E Ratio12.3241.5330%
Revenue15.7B1.1B1,430%
Total Cash45.2B102M44,314%
Total Debt9B50M18,006%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
L vs UFCS: Fundamental Ratings
L
UFCS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1267
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
771
SMR RATING
1..100
9778
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3252
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2589
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UFCS's Valuation (41) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (70). This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UFCS (71). This means that L’s stock grew somewhat faster than UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's SMR Rating (78) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (97). This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (32) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as UFCS (52). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

L's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UFCS (89). This means that L’s stock grew somewhat faster than UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LUFCS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UFCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TEOJX9.70N/A
N/A
Transamerica Emerging Markets Eq I2
UIVIX12.73N/A
N/A
MFS Intrinsic Value I
VVOAX22.18N/A
N/A
Invesco Value Opportunities A
VVSGX16.63N/A
N/A
VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth
GAAHX18.55-0.13
-0.70%
GMO Resources R6

L and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To L
1D Price
Change %
L100%
+0.84%
HIG - L
84%
Closely correlated
+0.97%
CINF - L
84%
Closely correlated
+2.41%
CNA - L
82%
Closely correlated
+2.19%
THG - L
77%
Closely correlated
+1.39%
TRV - L
77%
Closely correlated
+0.91%
More

UFCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UFCS has been closely correlated with SAFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UFCS jumps, then SAFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UFCS
1D Price
Change %
UFCS100%
+7.16%
SAFT - UFCS
66%
Closely correlated
+0.27%
CINF - UFCS
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.41%
L - UFCS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
AFG - UFCS
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.69%
THG - UFCS
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.39%
More