Ad is loading...
L
Price
$85.17
Change
+$0.68 (+0.80%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
80 days until earnings call
UFCS
Price
$29.75
Change
+$2.20 (+7.99%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
82 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

L vs UFCS

Header iconL vs UFCS Comparison
Open Charts L vs UFCSBanner chart's image
Loews
Price$85.17
Change+$0.68 (+0.80%)
Volume$1.06M
CapitalizationN/A
United Fire Group
Price$29.75
Change+$2.20 (+7.99%)
Volume$229.17K
CapitalizationN/A
L vs UFCS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
UFCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
L vs. UFCS commentary
Nov 22, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is L is a StrongBuy and UFCS is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 22, 2024
Stock price -- (L: $85.17 vs. UFCS: $29.75)
Brand notoriety: L and UFCS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: L: 132% vs. UFCS: 183%
Market capitalization -- L: $17.4B vs. UFCS: $550.29M
L [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $17.4B. UFCS’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $550.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

L’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUFCS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • L’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UFCS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both L and UFCS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

L’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UFCS’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • L’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • UFCS’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the short-term than UFCS.

Price Growth

L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +2.86% price change this week, while UFCS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +18.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +3.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

L is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2025.

UFCS is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+3.87% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
L($17.4B) has a higher market cap than UFCS($550M). UFCS has higher P/E ratio than L: UFCS (41.53) vs L (12.32). UFCS YTD gains are higher at: 51.148 vs. L (22.692). L has more cash in the bank: 45.2B vs. UFCS (102M). UFCS has less debt than L: UFCS (50M) vs L (9B). L has higher revenues than UFCS: L (15.7B) vs UFCS (1.1B).
LUFCSL / UFCS
Capitalization17.4B550M3,164%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD22.69251.14844%
P/E Ratio12.3241.5330%
Revenue15.7B1.1B1,430%
Total Cash45.2B102M44,314%
Total Debt9B50M18,006%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
L vs UFCS: Fundamental Ratings
L
UFCS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1824
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
23100
SMR RATING
1..100
9880
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3237
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5553
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UFCS's Valuation (38) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (68). This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for UFCS (100). This means that L’s stock grew significantly faster than UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's SMR Rating (80) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (98). This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (32) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as UFCS (37). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (55). This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LUFCS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
UFCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSFJX20.920.13
+0.63%
MFS Total Return R4
MACHX22.060.12
+0.55%
MoA Balanced Fund
GSWPX25.76N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth P
MMNBX10.88N/A
N/A
MassMutual Diversified Value Y
WXCIX12.99-0.10
-0.76%
William Blair Emerg Mkts ex China Gr I

L and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with CNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then CNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To L
1D Price
Change %
L100%
+0.80%
CNA - L
82%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
AXS - L
76%
Closely correlated
+1.79%
HIG - L
74%
Closely correlated
+1.21%
CINF - L
72%
Closely correlated
+2.13%
RLI - L
71%
Closely correlated
+1.15%
More

UFCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UFCS has been loosely correlated with SAFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UFCS jumps, then SAFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UFCS
1D Price
Change %
UFCS100%
+7.99%
SAFT - UFCS
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
L - UFCS
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.80%
CINF - UFCS
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.13%
AFG - UFCS
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.15%
HMN - UFCS
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
More