Ad is loading...
LAAFX vs RMEBX
LAAFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAAFX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F
Price$17.95
Change+$1.17 (+6.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.32B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$53.86
Change+$3.35 (+6.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.3B
LAAFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAAFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAAFX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 98.3B vs. LAAFX (5.32B). LAAFX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LAAFX (1.77) vs RMEBX (1.18). LAAFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAAFX (18 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAAFX (0.55). LAAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LAAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAAFX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.56 vs. LAAFX (-7.02). RMEBX (44.36) and LAAFX (43.67) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAAFX | RMEBX | LAAFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 1.07 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 1.07 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.659 | -7.747 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.32B | 98.3B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.77 | 1.18 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.02 | -4.56 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.60 | -1.07 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.67 | 44.36 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.59 | 44.99 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...