Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAAFX vs RMEBX
LAAFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAAFX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F
Price$19.89
Change+$0.08 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.17B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.87
Change+$0.15 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.87B
LAAFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAAFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAAFX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LAAFX (6.17B). LAAFX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LAAFX (1.60) vs RMEBX (1.12). LAAFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAAFX (18 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAAFX (0.54). LAAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LAAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAAFX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.49 vs. LAAFX (7.43). RMEBX (57.31) and LAAFX (56.63) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAAFX | RMEBX | LAAFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.07 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.07 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.009 | 9.641 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.17B | 109B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 1.12 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.43 | 9.49 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.53 | 30.38 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.63 | 57.31 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.71 | 74.78 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers