Ad is loading...
LAAFX vs RMEBX
LAAFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAAFX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F
Price$18.65
Change-$0.52 (-2.71%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$54.53
Change-$1.42 (-2.54%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
LAAFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAAFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAAFX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 98.7B vs. LAAFX (6.2B). LAAFX (1.62) and RMEBX (1.54) have matching dividends . LAAFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAAFX (17 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). LAAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMEBX (25.00). LAAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAAFX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LAAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.32 vs. RMEBX (12.51). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 39.44 vs. LAAFX (28.05).
| LAAFX | RMEBX | LAAFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.005 | 11.313 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.2B | 98.7B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 1.54 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.32 | 12.51 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.17 | 13.70 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.05 | 39.44 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.87 | 60.50 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...