Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAAFX vs RMEBX
LAAFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAAFX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F
Price$20.63
Change+$0.08 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.24B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.36
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
LAAFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAAFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAAFX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LAAFX (6.24B). LAAFX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LAAFX (1.49) vs RMEBX (1.05). LAAFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAAFX (18 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAAFX (0.54). LAAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LAAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAAFX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.86 vs. LAAFX (2.93). RMEBX (51.57) and LAAFX (49.43) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAAFX | RMEBX | LAAFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.07 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.07 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.346 | 12.627 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.24B | 110B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 1.05 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.93 | 5.86 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.51 | 27.41 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.43 | 51.57 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.85 | 82.95 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers