Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAAFX vs RMEBX
LAAFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAAFX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F
Price$18.92
Change-$0.05 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.04B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.32
Change-$0.14 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.75B
LAAFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAAFX vs. RMEBX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAAFX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LAAFX (6.04B). LAAFX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LAAFX (1.79) vs RMEBX (1.21). LAAFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAAFX (18 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAAFX (0.54). LAAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LAAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAAFX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LAAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.03 vs. RMEBX (5.12). LAAFX return over 5 years is better than : 62.97 vs. RMEBX (58.45).
| LAAFX | RMEBX | LAAFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.07 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.07 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.639 | 3.121 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.04B | 105B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 1.21 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.03 | 5.12 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.76 | 19.95 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.97 | 58.45 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.30 | 60.74 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement