Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAAFX vs RMEBX
LAAFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAAFX vs RMEBX
LAAFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAAFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAAFX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LAAFX (6.87B). RMEBX (0.99) and LAAFX (0.97) have matching dividends . LAAFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAAFX (19 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAAFX (0.54). LAAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). LAAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAAFX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LAAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.31 vs. RMEBX (9.03). RMEBX (35.75) and LAAFX (34.37) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAAFX | RMEBX | LAAFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.07 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.07 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.675 | 10.367 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.87B | 118B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.99 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.31 | 9.03 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.02 | 38.30 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.37 | 35.75 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.25 | 90.55 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement