Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAAFX vs RMEBX
LAAFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAAFX vs RMEBX
LAAFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAAFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAAFX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LAAFX (6.88B). LAAFX (1.07) and RMEBX (1.04) have matching dividends . LAAFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAAFX (19 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAAFX (0.54). LAAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). LAAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAAFX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LAAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.67 vs. RMEBX (9.11). LAAFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.77 vs. RMEBX (34.74).
| LAAFX | RMEBX | LAAFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.07 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.07 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.783 | 6.308 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.88B | 117B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.04 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.67 | 9.11 | 194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.61 | 34.37 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.77 | 34.74 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.78 | 94.33 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement