Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAAFX vs RMEBX
LAAFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAAFX vs RMEBX
LAAFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAAFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAAFX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LAAFX (6.76B). RMEBX (0.99) and LAAFX (0.97) have matching dividends . LAAFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAAFX (19 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAAFX (0.54). LAAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). LAAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAAFX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LAAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.12 vs. RMEBX (4.54). RMEBX (33.78) and LAAFX (33.42) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAAFX | RMEBX | LAAFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.07 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.07 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.120 | 8.108 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.76B | 117B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.99 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.12 | 4.54 | 201% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.80 | 34.17 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.42 | 33.78 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.05 | 91.58 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement