Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAAFX vs RMFCX
LAAFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAAFX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F
Price$20.63
Change+$0.08 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.24B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.02
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
LAAFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAAFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAAFX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LAAFX (6.24B). LAAFX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LAAFX (1.49) vs RMFCX (1.21). LAAFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAAFX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAAFX (0.54). LAAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAAFX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.00 vs. LAAFX (2.93). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.67 vs. LAAFX (49.43).
| LAAFX | RMFCX | LAAFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.91 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.91 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.346 | 12.783 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.24B | 110B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 1.21 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.93 | 6.00 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.51 | 27.94 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.43 | 52.67 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.85 | 84.73 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers