Ad is loading...
LAAFX vs RMFCX
LAAFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAAFX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F
Price$18.65
Change-$0.52 (-2.71%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$54.22
Change-$1.42 (-2.55%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
LAAFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAAFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAAFX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 98.7B vs. LAAFX (6.2B). RMFCX (1.69) and LAAFX (1.62) have matching dividends . LAAFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAAFX (17 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFCX (25.00). LAAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAAFX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.32 vs. RMFCX (12.63). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.39 vs. LAAFX (28.05).
| LAAFX | RMFCX | LAAFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.005 | 11.423 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.2B | 98.7B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 1.69 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.32 | 12.63 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.17 | 14.16 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.05 | 40.39 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.87 | 61.84 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers