Ad is loading...
LAAFX vs RMFCX
LAAFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAAFX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F
Price$19.28
Change+$0.13 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.22B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.77
Change+$0.30 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.41B
LAAFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAAFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAAFX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. LAAFX (6.22B). RMFCX (1.69) and LAAFX (1.62) have matching dividends . LAAFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAAFX (17 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFCX (25.00). LAAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAAFX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.63 vs. RMFCX (12.43). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.82 vs. LAAFX (27.67).
| LAAFX | RMFCX | LAAFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.433 | 2.162 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 103B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 1.69 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.63 | 12.43 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.22 | 12.60 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.67 | 37.82 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.56 | 65.18 | 56% |