Ad is loading...
LAAFX vs RMFCX
LAAFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAAFX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F
Price$17.95
Change+$1.17 (+6.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.32B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$53.56
Change+$3.33 (+6.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.3B
LAAFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAAFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAAFX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 98.3B vs. LAAFX (5.32B). LAAFX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LAAFX (1.77) vs RMFCX (1.34). LAAFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAAFX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAAFX (0.55). LAAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAAFX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.43 vs. LAAFX (-7.02). RMFCX (45.42) and LAAFX (43.67) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAAFX | RMFCX | LAAFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.91 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.91 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.659 | -7.697 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.32B | 98.3B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.77 | 1.34 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.02 | -4.43 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.60 | -0.65 | 246% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.67 | 45.42 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.59 | 46.29 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...