Ad is loading...
LAAFX vs RMFCX
LAAFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAAFX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F
Price$19.46
Change-$0.32 (-1.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.23B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.23
Change-$0.62 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.48B
LAAFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAAFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAAFX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LAAFX (6.23B). RMFCX (1.69) and LAAFX (1.62) have matching dividends . LAAFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAAFX (17 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFCX (25.00). LAAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAAFX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.64 vs. RMFCX (11.03). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 41.75 vs. LAAFX (30.50).
| LAAFX | RMFCX | LAAFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.399 | 4.836 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.23B | 105B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 1.69 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.64 | 11.03 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.02 | 19.69 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.50 | 41.75 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.79 | 64.83 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...