Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAAFX vs RMFCX
LAAFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAAFX vs RMFCX
LAAFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAAFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAAFX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LAAFX (6.87B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAAFX: RMFCX (1.15) vs LAAFX (0.97). LAAFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAAFX (19 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAAFX (0.54). LAAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). LAAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAAFX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.31 vs. RMFCX (9.14). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.70 vs. LAAFX (34.37).
| LAAFX | RMFCX | LAAFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.91 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.91 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.675 | 10.454 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.87B | 118B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 1.15 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.31 | 9.14 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.02 | 38.82 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.37 | 36.70 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.25 | 92.27 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers