Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAAFX vs RMFCX
LAAFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAAFX vs RMFCX
LAAFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAAFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAAFX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. LAAFX (6.73B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAAFX: RMFCX (1.19) vs LAAFX (1.07). LAAFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAAFX (19 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAAFX (0.54). LAAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). LAAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAAFX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.02 vs. RMFCX (10.10). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.85 vs. LAAFX (31.77).
| LAAFX | RMFCX | LAAFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.91 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.91 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.381 | 5.845 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.73B | 115B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.19 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.02 | 10.10 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.10 | 34.65 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.77 | 33.85 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.30 | 91.46 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement