Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAAFX vs RMFCX
LAAFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAAFX vs RMFCX
LAAFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAAFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAAFX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LAAFX (6.89B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAAFX: RMFCX (1.16) vs LAAFX (0.97). LAAFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAAFX (19 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAAFX (0.54). LAAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). LAAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAAFX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.41 vs. RMFCX (7.69). RMFCX (37.08) and LAAFX (36.87) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAAFX | RMFCX | LAAFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.91 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.91 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.475 | 9.325 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.89B | 118B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 1.16 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.41 | 7.69 | 187% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.05 | 32.42 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.87 | 37.08 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.29 | 91.03 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement