Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAAFX vs RMFEX
LAAFX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAAFX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F
Price$20.63
Change+$0.08 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.24B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.42
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
LAAFX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAAFX vs. RMFEX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAAFX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LAAFX (6.24B). LAAFX (1.49) and RMFEX (1.46) have matching dividends . LAAFX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAAFX (18 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). RMFEX (0.62) is less costly to investors than LAAFX (0.54). LAAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAAFX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.34 vs. LAAFX (2.93). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 55.02 vs. LAAFX (49.43).
| LAAFX | RMFEX | LAAFX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.62 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.62 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.346 | 13.076 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.24B | 110B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 1.46 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.93 | 6.34 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.51 | 29.13 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.43 | 55.02 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.85 | 92.11 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers