Ad is loading...
LAAFX vs RMFEX
LAAFX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAAFX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F
Price$17.95
Change+$1.17 (+6.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.32B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$53.89
Change+$3.35 (+6.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.3B
LAAFX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAAFX vs. RMFEX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAAFX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 98.3B vs. LAAFX (5.32B). LAAFX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: LAAFX (1.77) vs RMFEX (1.61). LAAFX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAAFX (18 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). RMFEX (0.62) is less costly to investors than LAAFX (0.55). LAAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAAFX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.11 vs. LAAFX (-7.02). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 47.69 vs. LAAFX (43.67).
| LAAFX | RMFEX | LAAFX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.62 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.62 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.659 | -7.620 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.32B | 98.3B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.77 | 1.61 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.02 | -4.11 | 171% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.60 | 0.28 | -579% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.67 | 47.69 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.59 | 51.93 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...