Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAAFX vs RMFEX
LAAFX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAAFX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F
Price$20.19
Change-$0.10 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.27B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.46
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.9B
LAAFX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAAFX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAAFX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LAAFX (6.27B). LAAFX (1.58) and RMFEX (1.51) have matching dividends . LAAFX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAAFX (18 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). RMFEX (0.62) is less costly to investors than LAAFX (0.54). LAAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAAFX (0) vs RMFEX (250). LAAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.04 vs. RMFEX (8.10). RMFEX (57.34) and LAAFX (54.79) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAAFX | RMFEX | LAAFX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.62 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.62 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.602 | 10.922 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.27B | 110B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 1.51 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.04 | 8.10 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.34 | 23.84 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.79 | 57.34 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.70 | 86.04 | 52% |