Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAAFX vs RMFEX
LAAFX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAAFX vs RMFEX
LAAFX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAAFX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAAFX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LAAFX (6.89B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAAFX: RMFEX (1.42) vs LAAFX (0.97). LAAFX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAAFX (19 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). RMFEX (0.62) is less costly to investors than LAAFX (0.54). LAAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). LAAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAAFX (0) vs RMFEX (250). LAAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.41 vs. RMFEX (8.04). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.23 vs. LAAFX (36.87).
| LAAFX | RMFEX | LAAFX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.62 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.62 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.475 | 9.507 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.89B | 118B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 1.42 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.41 | 8.04 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.05 | 33.67 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.87 | 39.23 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.29 | 99.14 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement