Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAAFX vs RMFEX
LAAFX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAAFX vs RMFEX
LAAFX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAAFX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAAFX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. LAAFX (6.73B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAAFX: RMFEX (1.45) vs LAAFX (1.07). LAAFX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAAFX (19 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). RMFEX (0.62) is less costly to investors than LAAFX (0.54). LAAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). LAAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAAFX (0) vs RMFEX (250). LAAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.02 vs. RMFEX (10.46). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 35.97 vs. LAAFX (31.77).
| LAAFX | RMFEX | LAAFX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.62 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.62 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.381 | 5.987 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.73B | 115B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.45 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.02 | 10.46 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.10 | 35.96 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.77 | 35.97 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.30 | 99.50 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement