Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAAFX vs RMFEX
LAAFX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAAFX vs RMFEX
LAAFX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAAFX vs. RMFEX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAAFX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LAAFX (6.76B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAAFX: RMFEX (1.41) vs LAAFX (0.97). LAAFX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAAFX (19 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). RMFEX (0.62) is less costly to investors than LAAFX (0.54). LAAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). LAAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAAFX (0) vs RMFEX (250). LAAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.12 vs. RMFEX (5.00). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 36.84 vs. LAAFX (33.42).
| LAAFX | RMFEX | LAAFX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.62 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.62 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.120 | 8.435 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.76B | 117B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 1.41 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.12 | 5.00 | 182% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.80 | 36.00 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.42 | 36.84 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.05 | 101.75 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement