It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LAC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LAC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
LAC (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -8.62% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.51%.
LAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2023.
The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
LAC | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LAC | LITP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago75% | 4 days ago77% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago76% | 4 days ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago80% | 4 days ago88% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago83% | 4 days ago90% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago85% | 4 days ago90% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago83% | 25 days ago86% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago85% | 4 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago71% | 4 days ago87% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 4 days ago90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LITP | 100% | -0.30% | ||
SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -0.96% | ||
ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
PLL - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | -2.40% | ||
SGML - LITP | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.01% | ||
LAC - LITP | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.02% | ||
More |