Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFCX vs RMEBX
LAFCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFCX vs RMEBX
LAFCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFCX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LAFCX (6.84B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAFCX: RMEBX (1.04) vs LAFCX (0.26). LAFCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFCX (30 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). LAFCX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LAFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFCX: RMEBX (250) vs LAFCX (1000). LAFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.61 vs. RMEBX (10.14). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.62 vs. LAFCX (33.04).
| LAFCX | RMEBX | LAFCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.07 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.07 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.295 | 6.444 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.84B | 117B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 1.04 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.61 | 10.14 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.52 | 34.54 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.04 | 35.62 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.35 | 94.57 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement