Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFCX vs RMFCX
LAFCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFCX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated C
Price$21.05
Change+$0.19 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.34B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.01
Change+$0.50 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
LAFCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAFCX (6.34B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAFCX: RMFCX (1.20) vs LAFCX (0.65). LAFCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFCX (29 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAFCX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFCX: RMFCX (250) vs LAFCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.54 vs. LAFCX (3.67). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.04 vs. LAFCX (53.82).
| LAFCX | RMFCX | LAFCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.91 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.91 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.533 | 14.613 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.34B | 111B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.20 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.67 | 5.54 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.52 | 39.44 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.82 | 61.04 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.16 | 88.77 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers