Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFCX vs RMFCX
LAFCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFCX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated C
Price$20.83
Change-$0.04 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.37B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.89
Change-$0.48 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.34B
LAFCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFCX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAFCX (6.37B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAFCX: RMFCX (1.24) vs LAFCX (0.71). LAFCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFCX (29 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAFCX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFCX: RMFCX (250) vs LAFCX (1000). LAFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.65 vs. RMFCX (6.02). RMFCX (62.19) and LAFCX (59.60) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFCX | RMFCX | LAFCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.91 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.91 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.586 | 12.543 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.37B | 111B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 1.24 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.65 | 6.02 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.08 | 40.53 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.60 | 62.19 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.84 | 103.10 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement