Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFCX vs RMFCX
LAFCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFCX vs RMFCX
LAFCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFCX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LAFCX (6.76B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAFCX: RMFCX (1.15) vs LAFCX (0.15). LAFCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFCX (30 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LAFCX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFCX: RMFCX (250) vs LAFCX (1000). LAFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.54 vs. RMFCX (4.75). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.61 vs. LAFCX (29.15).
| LAFCX | RMFCX | LAFCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.91 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.91 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.379 | 8.539 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.76B | 117B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 1.15 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.54 | 4.75 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.68 | 35.38 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.15 | 35.61 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.60 | 94.16 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement