Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFCX vs RMFEX
LAFCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFCX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated C
Price$20.30
Change-$0.10 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.27B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.46
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.9B
LAFCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFCX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LAFCX (6.27B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAFCX: RMFEX (1.51) vs LAFCX (0.73). LAFCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFCX (29 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAFCX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFCX: RMFEX (250) vs LAFCX (1000). RMFEX (8.10) and LAFCX (8.05) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 57.34 vs. LAFCX (50.20).
| LAFCX | RMFEX | LAFCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.62 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.62 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.987 | 10.922 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.27B | 110B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 1.51 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.05 | 8.10 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.60 | 23.84 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.20 | 57.34 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.84 | 86.04 | 43% |