Ad is loading...
LAFCX vs RMFEX
LAFCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFCX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated C
Price$17.91
Change+$0.31 (+1.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.53B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$53.29
Change+$0.77 (+1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
LAFCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFCX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. LAFCX (5.54B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAFCX: RMFEX (1.61) vs LAFCX (0.85). LAFCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFCX (29 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAFCX (1.45) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFCX: RMFEX (250) vs LAFCX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.21 vs. LAFCX (-2.98). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 55.72 vs. LAFCX (45.70).
| LAFCX | RMFEX | LAFCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.62 | 234% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.62 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.078 | -2.593 | 234% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.54B | 95.8B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.61 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.98 | 2.21 | -135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.06 | 7.26 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.70 | 55.72 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.40 | 60.75 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...