Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFCX vs RMFEX
LAFCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFCX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated C
Price$19.33
Change-$0.20 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.01B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$57.86
Change-$0.45 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
LAFCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFCX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. LAFCX (6.01B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAFCX: RMFEX (1.58) vs LAFCX (0.83). LAFCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFCX (29 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAFCX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFCX: RMFEX (250) vs LAFCX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.03 vs. LAFCX (6.56). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 62.32 vs. LAFCX (52.41).
| LAFCX | RMFEX | LAFCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.62 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.62 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.155 | 6.152 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.01B | 106B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.58 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.56 | 9.03 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.93 | 29.63 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.41 | 62.32 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.29 | 76.27 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement