Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFCX vs RMFEX
LAFCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFCX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated C
Price$21.05
Change+$0.19 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.34B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$62.40
Change+$0.51 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
LAFCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFCX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAFCX (6.34B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAFCX: RMFEX (1.46) vs LAFCX (0.65). LAFCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFCX (29 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAFCX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFCX: RMFEX (250) vs LAFCX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.87 vs. LAFCX (3.67). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 63.57 vs. LAFCX (53.82).
| LAFCX | RMFEX | LAFCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.62 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.62 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.533 | 14.880 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.34B | 111B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.46 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.67 | 5.87 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.52 | 40.73 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.82 | 63.57 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.16 | 96.37 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement