Ad is loading...
LAFCX vs RMFEX
LAFCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFCX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated C
Price$18.77
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.87B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$55.34
Change-$0.12 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.86B
LAFCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFCX vs. RMFEX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFCX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. LAFCX (5.87B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAFCX: RMFEX (1.65) vs LAFCX (0.86). LAFCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFCX (29 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAFCX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFCX: RMFEX (250) vs LAFCX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.72 vs. LAFCX (3.36). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 58.22 vs. LAFCX (53.90).
| LAFCX | RMFEX | LAFCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.62 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.62 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.166 | 1.154 | 14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.87B | 101B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.65 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.36 | 4.72 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.81 | 18.36 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.90 | 58.22 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.00 | 66.67 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...