Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFCX vs RMFEX
LAFCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFCX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated C
Price$20.83
Change-$0.04 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.37B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.26
Change-$0.49 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.34B
LAFCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFCX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAFCX (6.37B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAFCX: RMFEX (1.49) vs LAFCX (0.71). LAFCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFCX (29 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAFCX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFCX: RMFEX (250) vs LAFCX (1000). LAFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.65 vs. RMFEX (6.37). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 64.68 vs. LAFCX (59.60).
| LAFCX | RMFEX | LAFCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.62 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.62 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.586 | 12.781 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.37B | 111B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 1.49 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.65 | 6.37 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.08 | 41.82 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.60 | 64.68 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.84 | 111.22 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement