Ad is loading...
LAFCX vs RMFEX
LAFCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFCX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated C
Price$19.39
Change+$0.12 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.22B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$56.11
Change+$0.29 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.41B
LAFCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFCX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. LAFCX (6.22B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAFCX: RMFEX (1.95) vs LAFCX (0.80). LAFCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFCX (28 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFEX (25.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFCX: RMFEX (250) vs LAFCX (1000). LAFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.58 vs. RMFEX (12.78). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.96 vs. LAFCX (24.54).
| LAFCX | RMFEX | LAFCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.358 | 2.167 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 103B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.95 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.58 | 12.78 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.33 | 13.63 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.54 | 39.96 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.61 | 71.41 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...