Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFCX vs RMFEX
LAFCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFCX vs RMFEX
LAFCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFCX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LAFCX (6.87B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAFCX: RMFEX (1.41) vs LAFCX (0.15). LAFCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFCX (30 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). LAFCX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFCX: RMFEX (250) vs LAFCX (1000). LAFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.29 vs. RMFEX (9.52). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 38.89 vs. LAFCX (29.81).
| LAFCX | RMFEX | LAFCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.62 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.62 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.015 | 10.681 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.87B | 118B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 1.41 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.29 | 9.52 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.02 | 40.18 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.81 | 38.89 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.23 | 100.46 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement