Ad is loading...
LAFFX vs RMEBX
LAFFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFFX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated A
Price$18.90
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.03B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.91
Change+$0.42 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.15B
LAFFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Mar 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFFX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 104B vs. LAFFX (6.03B). LAFFX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LAFFX (1.59) vs RMEBX (1.15). LAFFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFFX (75 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAFFX (0.70). LAFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFFX: RMEBX (250) vs LAFFX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.24 vs. LAFFX (6.06). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 52.38 vs. LAFFX (44.58).
| LAFFX | RMEBX | LAFFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 75 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.449 | 3.661 | 40% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.03B | 104B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 1.15 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.06 | 8.24 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.85 | 18.60 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.58 | 52.38 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.71 | 67.56 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...