Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFFX vs RMEBX
LAFFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFFX vs RMEBX
LAFFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFFX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LAFFX (6.88B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAFFX: RMEBX (1.04) vs LAFFX (0.94). LAFFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFFX (77 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAFFX (0.69). LAFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFFX: RMEBX (250) vs LAFFX (1000). LAFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.41 vs. RMEBX (9.11). LAFFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.91 vs. RMEBX (34.74).
| LAFFX | RMEBX | LAFFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 77 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.654 | 6.308 | 185% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.88B | 117B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 1.04 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.41 | 9.11 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.88 | 34.37 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.91 | 34.74 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.80 | 94.33 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement