Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFFX vs RMEBX
LAFFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFFX vs RMEBX
LAFFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFFX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LAFFX (6.92B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAFFX: RMEBX (1.00) vs LAFFX (0.88). LAFFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFFX (77 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAFFX (0.69). LAFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFFX: RMEBX (250) vs LAFFX (1000). LAFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.35 vs. RMEBX (8.73). LAFFX (36.92) and RMEBX (36.28) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFFX | RMEBX | LAFFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 77 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.407 | 9.059 | 148% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.92B | 118B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 1.00 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.35 | 8.73 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.21 | 34.30 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.92 | 36.28 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.32 | 89.36 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement