Ad is loading...
LAFLX vs RMEBX
LAFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFLX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value A
Price$12.97
Change-$0.08 (-0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.21M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$55.50
Change-$0.57 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.33B
LAFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFLX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 102B vs. LAFLX (34.2M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAFLX: RMEBX (1.15) vs LAFLX (0.65). LAFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFLX (6 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LAFLX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LAFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFLX: RMEBX (250) vs LAFLX (1500). LAFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.08 vs. RMEBX (6.82). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 62.77 vs. LAFLX (20.86).
| LAFLX | RMEBX | LAFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.07 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.07 | 179% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.604 | 2.131 | 75% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.2M | 102B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.15 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.08 | 6.82 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.94 | 16.31 | -49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.86 | 62.77 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 65.08 | - |