Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFLX vs RMEBX
LAFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFLX vs RMEBX
LAFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFLX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LAFLX (161M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAFLX: RMEBX (0.99) vs LAFLX (0.24). LAFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFLX (7 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). LAFLX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LAFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFLX: RMEBX (250) vs LAFLX (1500). LAFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.76 vs. RMEBX (4.65). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.68 vs. LAFLX (-8.41).
| LAFLX | RMEBX | LAFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.07 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.07 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.882 | 8.448 | 70% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 0.99 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.76 | 4.65 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.00 | 34.88 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.41 | 34.68 | -24% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.45 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers