Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFLX vs RMEBX
LAFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFLX vs RMEBX
LAFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFLX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LAFLX (157M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAFLX: RMEBX (1.00) vs LAFLX (0.25). LAFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFLX (7 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). LAFLX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LAFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFLX: RMEBX (250) vs LAFLX (1500). LAFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.70 vs. RMEBX (8.70). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.43 vs. LAFLX (-8.77).
| LAFLX | RMEBX | LAFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.07 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.07 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.753 | 9.399 | 61% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 157M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 1.00 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.70 | 8.70 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.29 | 35.78 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.77 | 36.43 | -24% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 90.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement