Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFLX vs RWEBX
LAFLX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFLX vs RWEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value A
Price$15.27
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.16M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$67.08
Change+$0.11 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.01B
LAFLX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFLX vs. RWEBX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFLX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. LAFLX (68.2M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than LAFLX: RWEBX (0.76) vs LAFLX (0.58). LAFLX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LAFLX (6 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). LAFLX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). LAFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFLX: RWEBX (250) vs LAFLX (1500). LAFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.24 vs. RWEBX (5.65). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 50.09 vs. LAFLX (14.19).
| LAFLX | RWEBX | LAFLX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.06 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 1.06 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.425 | 10.329 | 159% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68.2M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.76 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.24 | 5.65 | 270% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.44 | 43.20 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.19 | 50.09 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 76.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement