Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFLX vs RWEBX
LAFLX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFLX vs RWEBX
LAFLX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFLX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jul 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFLX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. LAFLX (157M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than LAFLX: RWEBX (0.76) vs LAFLX (0.25). LAFLX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LAFLX (7 years) vs RWEBX (12 years). LAFLX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). LAFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFLX: RWEBX (250) vs LAFLX (1500). LAFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.70 vs. RWEBX (4.77). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.10 vs. LAFLX (-8.77).
| LAFLX | RWEBX | LAFLX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.06 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.06 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.753 | 3.701 | 155% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 157M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.76 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.70 | 4.77 | 308% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.29 | 27.94 | 227% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.77 | 24.10 | -36% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 72.03 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement