Ad is loading...
LAFPX vs RMEBX
LAFPX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFPX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated P
Price$17.74
Change+$0.31 (+1.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.53B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$53.26
Change+$0.76 (+1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
LAFPX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFPX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFPX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. LAFPX (5.54B). LAFPX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LAFPX (1.43) vs RMEBX (1.18). LAFPX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFPX (27 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAFPX (0.90). LAFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LAFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAFPX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.74 vs. LAFPX (-2.48). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 52.21 vs. LAFPX (47.97).
| LAFPX | RMEBX | LAFPX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.07 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.07 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.990 | -2.724 | 220% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.54B | 95.8B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 1.18 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.48 | 1.74 | -142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.18 | 5.82 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.97 | 52.21 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.37 | 53.41 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...