Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFPX vs RMEBX
LAFPX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFPX vs RMEBX
LAFPX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFPX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFPX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LAFPX (6.88B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAFPX: RMEBX (1.04) vs LAFPX (0.77). LAFPX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFPX (29 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAFPX (0.89). LAFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). LAFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAFPX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LAFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.22 vs. RMEBX (10.14). LAFPX (35.84) and RMEBX (35.62) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFPX | RMEBX | LAFPX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.07 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.07 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.628 | 6.444 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.88B | 117B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 1.04 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.22 | 10.14 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.93 | 34.54 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.84 | 35.62 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.62 | 94.57 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement