Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFQX vs RMEBX
LAFQX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFQX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R2
Price$19.44
Change+$0.13 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.03B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.95
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
LAFQX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFQX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFQX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LAFQX (6.03B). LAFQX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LAFQX (1.23) vs RMEBX (1.16). LAFQX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFQX (18 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) and LAFQX (1.04) have similar cost to investors . LAFQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LAFQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAFQX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.87 vs. LAFQX (7.31). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 50.55 vs. LAFQX (44.35).
| LAFQX | RMEBX | LAFQX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.07 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.07 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.609 | 5.842 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.03B | 105B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 1.16 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.31 | 8.87 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.90 | 17.32 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.35 | 50.55 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.92 | 68.95 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers