Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFQX vs RMEBX
LAFQX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFQX vs RMEBX
LAFQX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
A.I.Advisor
published Highlights
Market Cap
The average market capitalization across the group is 62.38B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 6.89B to 117.86B. RMEBX holds the highest valuation in this group at 117.86B. The lowest valued company is LAFQX at 6.89B.
High and low price notable news
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was -0%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was -1%, and the average quarterly price growth was 9%. LAFQX experienced the highest price growth at 1%, while RMEBX experienced the biggest fall at -1%.
Volume
The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 0% and the average quarterly volume growth was 0%
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
LAFQX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFQX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LAFQX (6.89B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAFQX: RMEBX (0.99) vs LAFQX (0.53). LAFQX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFQX (19 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) and LAFQX (1.04) have similar cost to investors . LAFQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). LAFQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAFQX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LAFQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.07 vs. RMEBX (7.37). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.55 vs. LAFQX (30.95).
| LAFQX | RMEBX | LAFQX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.07 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.07 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.821 | 9.484 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.89B | 118B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.99 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.07 | 7.37 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.09 | 36.25 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.95 | 33.55 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.36 | 88.62 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement