Ad is loading...
LAFRX vs RMEBX
LAFRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFRX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R3
Price$19.44
Change-$0.32 (-1.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.23B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.54
Change-$0.62 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.48B
LAFRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFRX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LAFRX (6.23B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAFRX: RMEBX (1.54) vs LAFRX (1.27). LAFRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFRX (17 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). LAFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMEBX (25.00). LAFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAFRX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LAFRX (11.21) and RMEBX (10.88) have marching annual gain over last year. RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 40.75 vs. LAFRX (29.00).
| LAFRX | RMEBX | LAFRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.348 | 4.809 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.23B | 105B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.54 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.21 | 10.88 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.12 | 19.18 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.00 | 40.75 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.69 | 63.29 | 47% |