Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFRX vs RMEBX
LAFRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFRX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R3
Price$20.87
Change+$0.06 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.38B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.57
Change+$0.12 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.58B
LAFRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFRX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. LAFRX (6.39B). LAFRX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LAFRX (1.13) vs RMEBX (1.05). LAFRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFRX (18 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAFRX (0.94). LAFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LAFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAFRX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LAFRX (8.02) and RMEBX (7.71) have marching annual gain over last year. RMEBX (57.72) and LAFRX (54.91) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFRX | RMEBX | LAFRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.07 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.07 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.485 | 14.848 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.39B | 113B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 1.05 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.02 | 7.71 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.97 | 43.29 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.91 | 57.72 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.47 | 92.43 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers