Ad is loading...
LAFRX vs RMEBX
LAFRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFRX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R3
Price$18.50
Change-$0.40 (-2.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.03B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.07
Change-$0.84 (-1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.15B
LAFRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFRX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 104B vs. LAFRX (6.03B). LAFRX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LAFRX (1.36) vs RMEBX (1.15). LAFRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFRX (17 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAFRX (0.95). LAFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LAFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAFRX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.24 vs. LAFRX (5.80). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 52.38 vs. LAFRX (43.58).
| LAFRX | RMEBX | LAFRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.07 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.07 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.449 | 3.661 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.03B | 104B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.15 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.80 | 8.24 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.32 | 18.60 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.58 | 52.38 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.88 | 67.56 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers