Ad is loading...
LAFRX vs RMEBX
LAFRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFRX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R3
Price$17.69
Change-$0.04 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.61B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$52.90
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.51B
LAFRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFRX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 96.5B vs. LAFRX (5.61B). LAFRX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LAFRX (1.37) vs RMEBX (1.18). LAFRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFRX (18 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAFRX (0.95). LAFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LAFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAFRX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.48 vs. LAFRX (1.72). LAFRX (49.02) and RMEBX (47.73) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFRX | RMEBX | LAFRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.07 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.07 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.591 | -3.381 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.61B | 96.5B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.18 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.72 | 3.48 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.00 | 5.34 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.02 | 47.73 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.09 | 51.61 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...