Ad is loading...
LAFRX vs RMEBX
LAFRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFRX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R3
Price$19.26
Change+$0.12 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.22B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.08
Change+$0.30 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.41B
LAFRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFRX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. LAFRX (6.22B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAFRX: RMEBX (1.54) vs LAFRX (1.27). LAFRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFRX (17 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). LAFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMEBX (25.00). LAFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAFRX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LAFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.11 vs. RMEBX (12.29). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.84 vs. LAFRX (26.20).
| LAFRX | RMEBX | LAFRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.382 | 2.149 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 103B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.54 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.11 | 12.29 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.30 | 12.11 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.20 | 36.84 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.37 | 63.72 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...