Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFRX vs RMEBX
LAFRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFRX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R3
Price$20.39
Change+$0.09 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.27B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.67
Change+$0.25 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
LAFRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFRX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LAFRX (6.27B). LAFRX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LAFRX (1.22) vs RMEBX (1.11). LAFRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFRX (18 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAFRX (0.94). LAFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LAFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAFRX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LAFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.80 vs. RMEBX (6.47). RMEBX (53.04) and LAFRX (51.44) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFRX | RMEBX | LAFRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.07 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.07 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.500 | 11.106 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.27B | 109B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 1.11 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.80 | 6.47 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.99 | 27.70 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.44 | 53.04 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.66 | 87.33 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement