Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFRX vs RMEBX
LAFRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFRX vs RMEBX
LAFRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFRX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LAFRX (6.81B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAFRX: RMEBX (1.04) vs LAFRX (0.72). LAFRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFRX (19 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAFRX (0.94). LAFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). LAFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAFRX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LAFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.50 vs. RMEBX (9.46). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.78 vs. LAFRX (33.83).
| LAFRX | RMEBX | LAFRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.07 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.07 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.464 | 7.735 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.81B | 117B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 1.04 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.50 | 9.46 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.88 | 34.98 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.83 | 35.78 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.48 | 96.88 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers