Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFRX vs RMEBX
LAFRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFRX vs RMEBX
LAFRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFRX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LAFRX (6.81B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAFRX: RMEBX (0.99) vs LAFRX (0.62). LAFRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFRX (19 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAFRX (0.94). LAFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). LAFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAFRX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LAFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.59 vs. RMEBX (7.62). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.46 vs. LAFRX (29.82).
| LAFRX | RMEBX | LAFRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.07 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.07 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.517 | 9.416 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.81B | 118B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.99 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.59 | 7.62 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.04 | 34.98 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.82 | 33.46 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.66 | 89.41 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement