Ad is loading...
LAFRX vs RMFCX
LAFRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFRX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R3
Price$19.26
Change+$0.12 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.22B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.77
Change+$0.30 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.41B
LAFRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFRX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. LAFRX (6.22B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAFRX: RMFCX (1.69) vs LAFRX (1.27). LAFRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFRX (17 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFCX (25.00). LAFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.11 vs. RMFCX (12.43). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.82 vs. LAFRX (26.20).
| LAFRX | RMFCX | LAFRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.382 | 2.162 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 103B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.69 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.11 | 12.43 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.30 | 12.60 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.20 | 37.82 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.37 | 65.18 | 51% |