Ad is loading...
LAFRX vs RMFCX
LAFRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFRX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R3
Price$18.66
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.87B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.11
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.63B
LAFRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFRX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFRX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. LAFRX (5.87B). LAFRX (1.39) and RMFCX (1.37) have matching dividends . LAFRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFRX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAFRX (0.94) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . LAFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.35 vs. LAFRX (4.52). RMFCX (56.16) and LAFRX (56.08) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFRX | RMFCX | LAFRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.91 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.91 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.252 | 1.270 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.87B | 101B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.37 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.52 | 5.35 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.63 | 17.29 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.08 | 56.16 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.04 | 60.33 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...