Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFRX vs RMFCX
LAFRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFRX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R3
Price$20.87
Change+$0.06 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.38B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.21
Change+$0.11 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
LAFRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFRX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. LAFRX (6.39B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAFRX: RMFCX (1.20) vs LAFRX (1.13). LAFRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFRX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAFRX (0.94) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . LAFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAFRX (8.02) and RMFCX (7.84) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 58.89 vs. LAFRX (54.91).
| LAFRX | RMFCX | LAFRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.91 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.91 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.485 | 14.983 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.39B | 113B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 1.20 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.02 | 7.84 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.97 | 43.87 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.91 | 58.89 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.47 | 94.24 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers