Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFRX vs RMFCX
LAFRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFRX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R3
Price$19.21
Change-$0.20 (-1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.07B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.52
Change-$0.44 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
LAFRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFRX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. LAFRX (6.07B). LAFRX (1.34) and RMFCX (1.31) have matching dividends . LAFRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFRX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAFRX (0.94) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . LAFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. LAFRX (8.17). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.85 vs. LAFRX (56.24).
| LAFRX | RMFCX | LAFRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.91 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.91 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.450 | 6.021 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.07B | 106B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.31 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.17 | 8.70 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.59 | 28.43 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.24 | 59.85 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.44 | 69.75 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers