Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFRX vs RMFCX
LAFRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFRX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R3
Price$20.39
Change+$0.09 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.27B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.35
Change+$0.25 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
LAFRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFRX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LAFRX (6.27B). RMFCX (1.26) and LAFRX (1.22) have matching dividends . LAFRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFRX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAFRX (0.94) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . LAFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAFRX (6.80) and RMFCX (6.61) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.16 vs. LAFRX (51.44).
| LAFRX | RMFCX | LAFRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.91 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.91 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.500 | 11.237 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.27B | 109B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 1.26 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.80 | 6.61 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.99 | 28.25 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.44 | 54.16 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.66 | 89.05 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement