Ad is loading...
LAFRX vs RMFCX
LAFRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFRX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R3
Price$17.69
Change-$0.04 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.61B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.51B
LAFRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFRX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 96.5B vs. LAFRX (5.61B). LAFRX (1.37) and RMFCX (1.34) have matching dividends . LAFRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFRX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAFRX (0.95) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . LAFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.60 vs. LAFRX (1.72). LAFRX (49.02) and RMFCX (48.78) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFRX | RMFCX | LAFRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.91 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.91 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.591 | -3.342 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.61B | 96.5B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.34 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.72 | 3.60 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.00 | 5.79 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.02 | 48.78 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.09 | 52.90 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...