Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFRX vs RMFCX
LAFRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFRX vs RMFCX
LAFRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFRX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LAFRX (6.81B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAFRX: RMFCX (1.15) vs LAFRX (0.62). LAFRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFRX (19 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LAFRX (0.94) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . LAFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). LAFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.59 vs. RMFCX (7.75). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.38 vs. LAFRX (29.82).
| LAFRX | RMFCX | LAFRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.91 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.91 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.517 | 9.513 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.81B | 118B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 1.15 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.59 | 7.75 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.04 | 35.52 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.82 | 34.38 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.66 | 91.20 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement