Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFRX vs RMFCX
LAFRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFRX vs RMFCX
LAFRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFRX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LAFRX (6.81B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAFRX: RMFCX (1.19) vs LAFRX (0.72). LAFRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFRX (19 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LAFRX (0.94) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . LAFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). LAFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.50 vs. RMFCX (9.60). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.72 vs. LAFRX (33.83).
| LAFRX | RMFCX | LAFRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.91 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.91 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.464 | 7.804 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.81B | 117B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 1.19 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.50 | 9.60 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.88 | 35.52 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.83 | 36.72 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.48 | 98.68 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers