Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFRX vs RMFEX
LAFRX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFRX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R3
Price$20.39
Change+$0.09 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.27B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.74
Change+$0.25 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
LAFRX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFRX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFRX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LAFRX (6.27B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAFRX: RMFEX (1.51) vs LAFRX (1.22). LAFRX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFRX (18 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAFRX (0.94) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAFRX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX (6.95) and LAFRX (6.80) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 56.55 vs. LAFRX (51.44).
| LAFRX | RMFEX | LAFRX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.62 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.62 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.500 | 11.436 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.27B | 109B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 1.51 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.80 | 6.95 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.99 | 29.45 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.44 | 56.55 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.66 | 96.47 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement