Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFRX vs RMFEX
LAFRX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFRX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R3
Price$19.21
Change-$0.20 (-1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.07B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$57.86
Change-$0.45 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
LAFRX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFRX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFRX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. LAFRX (6.07B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAFRX: RMFEX (1.58) vs LAFRX (1.34). LAFRX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFRX (18 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAFRX (0.94) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAFRX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.03 vs. LAFRX (8.17). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 62.32 vs. LAFRX (56.24).
| LAFRX | RMFEX | LAFRX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.62 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.62 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.450 | 6.152 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.07B | 106B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.58 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.17 | 9.03 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.59 | 29.63 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.24 | 62.32 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.44 | 76.27 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement