Ad is loading...
LAFRX vs RMFEX
LAFRX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFRX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R3
Price$18.66
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.87B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$55.46
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.91B
LAFRX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFRX vs. RMFEX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFRX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. LAFRX (5.87B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAFRX: RMFEX (1.65) vs LAFRX (1.39). LAFRX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFRX (18 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAFRX (0.94) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAFRX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.68 vs. LAFRX (4.52). RMFEX (58.56) and LAFRX (56.08) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFRX | RMFEX | LAFRX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.62 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.62 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.252 | 1.374 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.87B | 101B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.65 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.52 | 5.68 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.63 | 18.38 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.08 | 58.56 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.04 | 66.50 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers