Ad is loading...
LAFRX vs RMFEX
LAFRX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFRX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R3
Price$19.26
Change+$0.12 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.22B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$56.11
Change+$0.29 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.41B
LAFRX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFRX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFRX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. LAFRX (6.22B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAFRX: RMFEX (1.95) vs LAFRX (1.27). LAFRX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFRX (17 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFEX (25.00). LAFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAFRX (0) vs RMFEX (250). LAFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.11 vs. RMFEX (12.78). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.96 vs. LAFRX (26.20).
| LAFRX | RMFEX | LAFRX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.382 | 2.167 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 103B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.95 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.11 | 12.78 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.30 | 13.63 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.20 | 39.96 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.37 | 71.41 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...