Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFRX vs RMFEX
LAFRX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFRX vs RMFEX
LAFRX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFRX vs. RMFEX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFRX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LAFRX (6.81B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAFRX: RMFEX (1.41) vs LAFRX (0.62). LAFRX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFRX (19 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). LAFRX (0.94) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). LAFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAFRX (0) vs RMFEX (250). LAFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.59 vs. RMFEX (8.11). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 36.54 vs. LAFRX (29.82).
| LAFRX | RMFEX | LAFRX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.62 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.62 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.517 | 9.745 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.81B | 118B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 1.41 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.59 | 8.11 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.04 | 36.84 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.82 | 36.54 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.66 | 99.30 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement