Ad is loading...
LAFSX vs RMEBX
LAFSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R4
Price$19.22
Change+$0.12 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.22B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.08
Change+$0.30 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.41B
LAFSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. LAFSX (6.22B). RMEBX (1.54) and LAFSX (1.49) have matching dividends . LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFSX (10 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMEBX (25.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAFSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LAFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.38 vs. RMEBX (12.29). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.84 vs. LAFSX (27.07).
| LAFSX | RMEBX | LAFSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.389 | 2.149 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 103B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 1.54 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.38 | 12.29 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.82 | 12.11 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.07 | 36.84 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.72 | - |