Ad is loading...
LAFSX vs RMEBX
LAFSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R4
Price$19.11
Change-$0.14 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$55.95
Change-$2.99 (-5.07%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
LAFSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 104B vs. LAFSX (6.32B). RMEBX (1.54) and LAFSX (1.49) have matching dividends . LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFSX (9 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMEBX (25.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAFSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LAFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.15 vs. RMEBX (12.51). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 39.44 vs. LAFSX (27.45).
| LAFSX | RMEBX | LAFSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.799 | 11.313 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.32B | 104B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 1.54 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.15 | 12.51 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.84 | 13.70 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.45 | 39.44 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 60.50 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...