Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFSX vs RMEBX
LAFSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R4
Price$20.26
Change-$0.11 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.27B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.67
Change+$0.25 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
LAFSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LAFSX (6.27B). LAFSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LAFSX (1.45) vs RMEBX (1.11). LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFSX (10 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAFSX (0.69). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAFSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LAFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.67 vs. RMEBX (6.47). LAFSX (54.43) and RMEBX (53.04) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFSX | RMEBX | LAFSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.253 | 11.106 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.27B | 109B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 1.11 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.67 | 6.47 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.42 | 27.70 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.43 | 53.04 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.65 | 87.33 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement