Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFSX vs RMEBX
LAFSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R4
Price$20.64
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.36B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.53
Change-$0.04 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
LAFSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAFSX (6.36B). LAFSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LAFSX (1.42) vs RMEBX (1.09). LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFSX (10 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAFSX (0.69). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAFSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LAFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.09 vs. RMEBX (6.63). LAFSX (57.91) and RMEBX (57.72) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFSX | RMEBX | LAFSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.769 | 12.681 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.36B | 111B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.09 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.09 | 6.63 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.83 | 33.39 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.91 | 57.72 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.13 | 94.26 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers