Ad is loading...
LAFSX vs RMEBX
LAFSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R4
Price$19.41
Change-$0.31 (-1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.23B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.54
Change-$0.62 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.48B
LAFSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LAFSX (6.23B). RMEBX (1.54) and LAFSX (1.49) have matching dividends . LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFSX (10 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMEBX (25.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAFSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LAFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.51 vs. RMEBX (10.88). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 40.75 vs. LAFSX (29.96).
| LAFSX | RMEBX | LAFSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.411 | 4.809 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.23B | 105B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 1.54 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.51 | 10.88 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.68 | 19.18 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.96 | 40.75 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.29 | - |