Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
LAFSX vs RMEBX
LAFSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R4
Price$20.22
Change-$0.11 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$58.52
Change-$0.52 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
LAFSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 104B vs. LAFSX (6.39B). RMEBX (1.54) and LAFSX (1.49) have matching dividends . LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFSX (9 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMEBX (25.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAFSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LAFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.05 vs. RMEBX (21.12). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.89 vs. LAFSX (34.52).
| LAFSX | RMEBX | LAFSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.467 | 16.258 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.39B | 104B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 1.54 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.05 | 21.12 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.57 | 14.92 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.52 | 43.89 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...