Ad is loading...
LAFSX vs RMEBX
LAFSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R4
Price$18.61
Change+$0.17 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.87B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.01
Change+$0.46 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets101.47B
LAFSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a Buy and RMEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. LAFSX (5.87B). LAFSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LAFSX (1.59) vs RMEBX (1.15). LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFSX (10 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAFSX (0.70). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAFSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.74 vs. LAFSX (1.42). LAFSX return over 5 years is better than : 81.17 vs. RMEBX (76.98).
| LAFSX | RMEBX | LAFSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.491 | 2.299 | -21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.87B | 101B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 1.15 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.42 | 4.74 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.35 | 10.55 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.17 | 76.98 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...