Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFSX vs RMEBX
LAFSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMEBX
LAFSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LAFSX (6.76B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAFSX: RMEBX (0.99) vs LAFSX (0.83). LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFSX (11 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAFSX (0.69). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAFSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LAFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.30 vs. RMEBX (4.65). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.68 vs. LAFSX (32.87).
| LAFSX | RMEBX | LAFSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.971 | 8.448 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.76B | 117B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 0.99 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.30 | 4.65 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.92 | 34.88 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.87 | 34.68 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.49 | 92.45 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement