Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFSX vs RMEBX
LAFSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMEBX
LAFSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LAFSX (6.78B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAFSX: RMEBX (1.04) vs LAFSX (0.94). LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFSX (11 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAFSX (0.69). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAFSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LAFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.97 vs. RMEBX (9.16). RMEBX (33.79) and LAFSX (32.20) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFSX | RMEBX | LAFSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.523 | 6.885 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.78B | 117B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 1.04 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.97 | 9.16 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.66 | 33.97 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.20 | 33.79 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.15 | 92.81 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers