Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFSX vs RMEBX
LAFSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMEBX
LAFSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LAFSX (6.92B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAFSX: RMEBX (1.00) vs LAFSX (0.88). LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFSX (11 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAFSX (0.69). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAFSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LAFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.38 vs. RMEBX (8.73). LAFSX (36.91) and RMEBX (36.28) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFSX | RMEBX | LAFSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.429 | 9.059 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.92B | 118B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 1.00 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.38 | 8.73 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.13 | 34.30 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.91 | 36.28 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.11 | 89.36 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers