Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFSX vs RMFCX
LAFSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R4
Price$19.65
Change+$0.13 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.15B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$58.40
Change+$0.13 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets107.25B
LAFSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 107B vs. LAFSX (6.15B). LAFSX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LAFSX (1.59) vs RMFCX (1.31). LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFSX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAFSX (0.69). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAFSX (9.99) and RMFCX (9.93) have marching annual gain over last year. LAFSX (64.53) and RMFCX (64.23) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFSX | RMFCX | LAFSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.356 | 7.643 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.15B | 107B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 1.31 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.99 | 9.93 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.90 | 27.81 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.53 | 64.23 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.87 | 76.26 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement