Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFSX vs RMFCX
LAFSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R4
Price$20.76
Change-$0.05 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.4B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.10
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
LAFSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. LAFSX (6.4B). LAFSX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LAFSX (1.35) vs RMFCX (1.20). LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFSX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAFSX (0.69). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.74 vs. RMFCX (8.11). RMFCX (59.28) and LAFSX (57.40) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFSX | RMFCX | LAFSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.936 | 14.779 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.4B | 113B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 1.20 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.74 | 8.11 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.26 | 43.61 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.40 | 59.28 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.03 | 93.90 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement