Ad is loading...
LAFSX vs RMFCX
LAFSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R4
Price$19.11
Change-$0.14 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.64
Change-$3.00 (-5.12%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
LAFSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 104B vs. LAFSX (6.32B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAFSX: RMFCX (1.69) vs LAFSX (1.49). LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFSX (9 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFCX (25.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.15 vs. RMFCX (12.63). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.39 vs. LAFSX (27.45).
| LAFSX | RMFCX | LAFSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.799 | 11.423 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.32B | 104B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 1.69 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.15 | 12.63 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.84 | 14.16 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.45 | 40.39 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 61.84 | - |