Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFSX vs RMFCX
LAFSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R4
Price$20.64
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.36B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.20
Change-$0.05 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
LAFSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAFSX (6.36B). LAFSX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LAFSX (1.42) vs RMFCX (1.24). LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFSX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAFSX (0.69). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.09 vs. RMFCX (6.75). RMFCX (58.84) and LAFSX (57.91) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFSX | RMFCX | LAFSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.769 | 12.804 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.36B | 111B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.24 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.09 | 6.75 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.83 | 33.93 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.91 | 58.84 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.13 | 96.04 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement