Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFSX vs RMFCX
LAFSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R4
Price$20.26
Change-$0.11 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.27B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.10
Change-$0.42 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
LAFSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LAFSX (6.27B). LAFSX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LAFSX (1.45) vs RMFCX (1.26). LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFSX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAFSX (0.69). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.67 vs. RMFCX (6.23). LAFSX (54.43) and RMFCX (54.32) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFSX | RMFCX | LAFSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.253 | 10.776 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.27B | 109B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 1.26 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.67 | 6.23 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.42 | 27.72 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.43 | 54.32 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.65 | 88.26 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement