Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFSX vs RMFCX
LAFSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R4
Price$19.95
Change+$0.25 (+1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.12B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.70
Change+$0.74 (+1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets107.77B
LAFSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. LAFSX (6.12B). LAFSX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LAFSX (1.45) vs RMFCX (1.26). LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFSX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAFSX (0.69). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX (9.53) and LAFSX (9.24) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.49 vs. LAFSX (53.64).
| LAFSX | RMFCX | LAFSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.627 | 10.039 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.12B | 108B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 1.26 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.24 | 9.53 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.69 | 26.33 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.64 | 56.49 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.75 | 79.59 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement