Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFSX vs RMFCX
LAFSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R4
Price$20.49
Change-$0.05 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.26B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.93
Change-$0.21 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.19B
LAFSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LAFSX (6.26B). LAFSX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LAFSX (1.36) vs RMFCX (1.21). LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFSX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAFSX (0.69). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.59 vs. LAFSX (2.78). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.85 vs. LAFSX (48.17).
| LAFSX | RMFCX | LAFSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.471 | 12.617 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.26B | 110B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.21 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.78 | 5.59 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.27 | 27.75 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.17 | 51.85 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.40 | 84.46 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement