Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFSX vs RMFCX
LAFSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMFCX
LAFSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LAFSX (6.87B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAFSX: RMFCX (1.15) vs LAFSX (0.84). LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFSX (11 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAFSX (0.69). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.13 vs. RMFCX (9.14). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.70 vs. LAFSX (33.50).
| LAFSX | RMFCX | LAFSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.580 | 10.454 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.87B | 118B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 1.15 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.13 | 9.14 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.39 | 38.82 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.50 | 36.70 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.12 | 92.27 | 73% |