Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFSX vs RMFCX
LAFSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMFCX
LAFSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LAFSX (6.92B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAFSX: RMFCX (1.16) vs LAFSX (0.88). LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFSX (11 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAFSX (0.69). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.38 vs. RMFCX (8.88). RMFCX (37.23) and LAFSX (36.91) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFSX | RMFCX | LAFSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.429 | 9.137 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.92B | 118B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 1.16 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.38 | 8.88 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.13 | 34.84 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.91 | 37.23 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.11 | 91.06 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement