Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFSX vs RMFEX
LAFSX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R4
Price$20.64
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.36B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.62
Change-$0.04 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
LAFSX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMFEX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAFSX (6.36B). RMFEX (1.49) and LAFSX (1.42) have matching dividends . LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFSX (10 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAFSX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAFSX (0) vs RMFEX (250). LAFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.09 vs. RMFEX (7.10). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 61.31 vs. LAFSX (57.91).
| LAFSX | RMFEX | LAFSX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.62 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.62 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.769 | 13.050 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.36B | 111B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.49 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.09 | 7.10 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.83 | 35.20 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.91 | 61.31 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.13 | 103.92 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers