Ad is loading...
LAFSX vs RMFEX
LAFSX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R4
Price$18.61
Change+$0.17 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.87B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$56.03
Change+$0.46 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets101.47B
LAFSX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMFEX commentary
Apr 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a Buy and RMFEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. LAFSX (5.87B). LAFSX (1.59) and RMFEX (1.56) have matching dividends . LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFSX (10 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAFSX (0.70) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAFSX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.21 vs. LAFSX (1.42). LAFSX (81.17) and RMFEX (81.02) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFSX | RMFEX | LAFSX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.62 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.62 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.491 | 2.415 | -20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.87B | 101B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 1.56 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.42 | 5.21 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.35 | 12.05 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.17 | 81.02 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.26 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...