Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFSX vs RMFEX
LAFSX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R4
Price$20.76
Change-$0.05 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.4B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$62.48
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
LAFSX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMFEX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. LAFSX (6.4B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAFSX: RMFEX (1.46) vs LAFSX (1.35). LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFSX (10 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAFSX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAFSX (0) vs RMFEX (250). LAFSX (8.74) and RMFEX (8.45) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 61.73 vs. LAFSX (57.40).
| LAFSX | RMFEX | LAFSX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.62 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.62 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.936 | 15.028 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.4B | 113B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 1.46 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.74 | 8.45 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.26 | 44.96 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.40 | 61.73 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.03 | 101.65 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement