Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFSX vs RMFEX
LAFSX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R4
Price$19.95
Change+$0.25 (+1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.12B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.09
Change+$0.76 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets107.77B
LAFSX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. LAFSX (6.12B). RMFEX (1.51) and LAFSX (1.45) have matching dividends . LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFSX (10 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAFSX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAFSX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.89 vs. LAFSX (9.24). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 58.94 vs. LAFSX (53.64).
| LAFSX | RMFEX | LAFSX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.62 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.62 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.627 | 10.243 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.12B | 108B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 1.51 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.24 | 9.89 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.69 | 27.52 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.64 | 58.94 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.75 | 86.68 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement