Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFSX vs RMFEX
LAFSX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R4
Price$20.26
Change-$0.11 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.27B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.49
Change-$0.42 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
LAFSX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LAFSX (6.27B). RMFEX (1.51) and LAFSX (1.45) have matching dividends . LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFSX (10 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAFSX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAFSX (0) vs RMFEX (250). LAFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.67 vs. RMFEX (6.56). RMFEX (56.71) and LAFSX (54.43) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFSX | RMFEX | LAFSX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.62 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.62 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.253 | 10.977 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.27B | 109B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 1.51 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.67 | 6.56 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.42 | 28.91 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.43 | 56.71 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.65 | 95.66 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement