Ad is loading...
LAFSX vs RMFEX
LAFSX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R4
Price$19.41
Change-$0.31 (-1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.23B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$57.60
Change-$0.62 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.48B
LAFSX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMFEX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a StrongBuy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LAFSX (6.23B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAFSX: RMFEX (1.95) vs LAFSX (1.49). LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFSX (10 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFEX (25.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAFSX (0) vs RMFEX (250). LAFSX (11.51) and RMFEX (11.37) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 43.97 vs. LAFSX (29.96).
| LAFSX | RMFEX | LAFSX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.411 | 4.880 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.23B | 105B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 1.95 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.51 | 11.37 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.68 | 20.81 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.96 | 43.97 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.03 | - |