Ad is loading...
LAFSX vs RMFEX
LAFSX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R4
Price$19.11
Change-$0.14 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$55.97
Change-$3.05 (-5.17%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
LAFSX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMFEX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 104B vs. LAFSX (6.32B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAFSX: RMFEX (1.95) vs LAFSX (1.49). LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFSX (9 years) vs RMFEX (22 years). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFEX (25.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAFSX (0) vs RMFEX (250). LAFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.15 vs. RMFEX (12.89). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 42.46 vs. LAFSX (27.45).
| LAFSX | RMFEX | LAFSX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.799 | 11.693 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.32B | 104B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 1.95 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.15 | 12.89 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.84 | 15.13 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.45 | 42.46 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 67.84 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...