Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFSX vs RMFEX
LAFSX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMFEX
LAFSX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LAFSX (6.84B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAFSX: RMFEX (1.41) vs LAFSX (0.84). LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFSX (11 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). LAFSX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAFSX (0) vs RMFEX (250). LAFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.58 vs. RMFEX (9.45). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.25 vs. LAFSX (34.40).
| LAFSX | RMFEX | LAFSX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.62 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.62 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.625 | 9.694 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.84B | 118B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 1.41 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.58 | 9.45 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.17 | 34.42 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.40 | 39.25 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.69 | 100.56 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers