Ad is loading...
LAFTX vs RMEBX
LAFTX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFTX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R5
Price$17.90
Change+$0.31 (+1.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.53B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$53.26
Change+$0.76 (+1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
LAFTX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFTX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFTX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. LAFTX (5.54B). LAFTX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LAFTX (1.86) vs RMEBX (1.18). LAFTX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFTX (10 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAFTX (0.45). LAFTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LAFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAFTX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.74 vs. LAFTX (-1.97). RMEBX (52.21) and LAFTX (50.34) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFTX | RMEBX | LAFTX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.07 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.07 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.831 | -2.724 | 214% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.54B | 95.8B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 1.18 | 157% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.97 | 1.74 | -113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.38 | 5.82 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.34 | 52.21 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 53.41 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...