Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFVX vs RMEBX
LAFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFVX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R6
Price$21.12
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.4B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.55
Change+$0.10 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.47B
LAFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFVX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAFVX (6.4B). LAFVX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LAFVX (1.56) vs RMEBX (1.05). LAFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFVX (10 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAFVX (0.39). LAFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LAFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAFVX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LAFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.44 vs. RMEBX (7.29). LAFVX (61.01) and RMEBX (59.63) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFVX | RMEBX | LAFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.07 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.07 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.116 | 14.812 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.4B | 112B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 1.05 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.44 | 7.29 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.63 | 43.24 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.01 | 59.63 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.32 | 92.37 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement