Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFVX vs RMEBX
LAFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFVX vs RMEBX
LAFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFVX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LAFVX (6.87B). LAFVX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LAFVX (1.04) vs RMEBX (0.99). LAFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFVX (11 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAFVX (0.39). LAFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). LAFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAFVX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LAFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.56 vs. RMEBX (9.03). RMEBX (35.75) and LAFVX (35.55) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFVX | RMEBX | LAFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.07 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.07 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.753 | 10.367 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.87B | 118B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.99 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.56 | 9.03 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.96 | 38.30 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.55 | 35.75 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.98 | 90.55 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement