Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFVX vs RMEBX
LAFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFVX vs RMEBX
LAFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFVX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LAFVX (6.88B). LAFVX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LAFVX (1.14) vs RMEBX (1.04). LAFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFVX (11 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAFVX (0.39). LAFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). LAFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAFVX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LAFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.88 vs. RMEBX (9.11). LAFVX return over 5 years is better than : 38.99 vs. RMEBX (34.74).
| LAFVX | RMEBX | LAFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.07 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.07 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.808 | 6.308 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.88B | 117B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.04 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.88 | 9.11 | 196% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.39 | 34.37 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.99 | 34.74 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.70 | 94.33 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement