Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFVX vs RMEBX
LAFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFVX vs RMEBX
LAFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. LAFVX (6.73B). LAFVX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LAFVX (1.14) vs RMEBX (1.04). LAFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFVX (11 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAFVX (0.39). LAFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). LAFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAFVX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LAFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.27 vs. RMEBX (9.98). RMEBX (32.93) and LAFVX (32.92) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFVX | RMEBX | LAFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.07 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.07 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.436 | 5.801 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.73B | 115B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.04 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.27 | 9.98 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.00 | 34.14 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.92 | 32.93 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.04 | 89.84 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement