Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFVX vs RMFCX
LAFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFVX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R6
Price$21.21
Change+$0.10 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.4B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.43
Change+$0.28 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.75B
LAFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. LAFVX (6.4B). LAFVX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LAFVX (1.56) vs RMFCX (1.20). LAFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFVX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAFVX (0.39). LAFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFVX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.82 vs. LAFVX (7.27). RMFCX (60.70) and LAFVX (60.29) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFVX | RMFCX | LAFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.91 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.91 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.652 | 15.389 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.4B | 113B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 1.20 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.27 | 7.82 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.99 | 37.81 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.29 | 60.70 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.66 | 91.06 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers