Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFVX vs RMFCX
LAFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFVX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R6
Price$21.12
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.4B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.20
Change+$0.11 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.47B
LAFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAFVX (6.4B). LAFVX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LAFVX (1.56) vs RMFCX (1.20). LAFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFVX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAFVX (0.39). LAFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFVX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.44 vs. RMFCX (7.44). LAFVX (61.01) and RMFCX (60.80) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFVX | RMFCX | LAFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.91 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.91 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.116 | 14.964 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.4B | 112B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 1.20 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.44 | 7.44 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.63 | 43.84 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.01 | 60.80 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.32 | 94.21 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement