Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFVX vs RMFCX
LAFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFVX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R6
Price$19.52
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.04B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.33
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.31B
LAFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LAFVX (6.04B). LAFVX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LAFVX (1.80) vs RMFCX (1.31). LAFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFVX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAFVX (0.39). LAFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFVX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.44 vs. LAFVX (7.89). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 50.95 vs. LAFVX (47.84).
| LAFVX | RMFCX | LAFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.91 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.91 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.942 | 5.423 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.04B | 105B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.31 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.89 | 8.44 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.19 | 18.47 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.84 | 50.95 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 69.73 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement