Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFVX vs RMFCX
LAFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFVX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R6
Price$19.95
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.13B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.29
Change+$0.26 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.17B
LAFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFVX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. LAFVX (6.13B). LAFVX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LAFVX (1.67) vs RMFCX (1.27). LAFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFVX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAFVX (0.39). LAFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFVX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.82 vs. LAFVX (5.52). RMFCX (56.75) and LAFVX (55.96) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFVX | RMFCX | LAFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.91 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.91 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.445 | 9.283 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.13B | 108B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 1.27 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.52 | 7.82 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.45 | 30.38 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.96 | 56.75 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.14 | 75.64 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement