Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFVX vs RMFCX
LAFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFVX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R6
Price$20.66
Change+$0.10 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.27B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.35
Change+$0.25 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
LAFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LAFVX (6.27B). LAFVX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LAFVX (1.65) vs RMFCX (1.26). LAFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFVX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAFVX (0.39). LAFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFVX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.41 vs. RMFCX (6.61). LAFVX (54.76) and RMFCX (54.16) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFVX | RMFCX | LAFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.91 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.91 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.810 | 11.237 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.27B | 109B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 1.26 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.41 | 6.61 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.88 | 28.25 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.76 | 54.16 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.94 | 89.05 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement