Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFVX vs RMFCX
LAFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFVX vs RMFCX
LAFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LAFVX (6.87B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAFVX: RMFCX (1.15) vs LAFVX (1.04). LAFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFVX (11 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAFVX (0.39). LAFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). LAFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFVX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.56 vs. RMFCX (9.14). RMFCX (36.70) and LAFVX (35.55) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFVX | RMFCX | LAFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.91 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.91 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.753 | 10.454 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.87B | 118B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.15 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.56 | 9.14 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.96 | 38.82 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.55 | 36.70 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.98 | 92.27 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement