Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFYX vs RMEBX
LAFYX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFYX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated I
Price$20.78
Change+$0.28 (+1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.25B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.77
Change+$0.78 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.72B
LAFYX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFYX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFYX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LAFYX (6.25B). LAFYX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LAFYX (1.57) vs RMEBX (1.05). LAFYX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFYX (28 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAFYX (0.44). LAFYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFYX: RMEBX (250) vs LAFYX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.35 vs. LAFYX (4.37). RMEBX (56.00) and LAFYX (55.32) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFYX | RMEBX | LAFYX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.07 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.07 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.618 | 13.380 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.25B | 110B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 1.05 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.37 | 5.35 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.18 | 42.11 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.32 | 56.00 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.00 | 88.79 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement