Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAGWX vs WCMLX
LAGWX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LAGWX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth A
Price$25.55
Change-$0.19 (-0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.1B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.83
Change-$0.18 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.69M
LAGWX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAGWX vs. WCMLX commentary
Oct 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAGWX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAGWX has more cash in the bank: 2.1B vs. WCMLX (43.7M). LAGWX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: LAGWX (0.02) vs WCMLX (0.00). LAGWX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LAGWX (52 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LAGWX (0.94). LAGWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). LAGWX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LAGWX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). LAGWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.53 vs. WCMLX (3.17). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 14.27 vs. LAGWX (-11.74).
| LAGWX | WCMLX | LAGWX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.99 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.79 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.859 | 8.942 | 166% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.1B | 43.7M | 4,808% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.53 | 3.17 | 396% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.89 | 38.17 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.74 | 14.27 | -82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.14 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement