Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAGWX vs WCMLX
LAGWX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LAGWX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth A
Price$25.07
Change-$0.03 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.11B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.78
Change-$0.06 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.17M
LAGWX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAGWX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAGWX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAGWX has more cash in the bank: 2.11B vs. WCMLX (45.2M). LAGWX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: LAGWX (0.02) vs WCMLX (0.00). LAGWX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LAGWX (52 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LAGWX (0.94). LAGWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). LAGWX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LAGWX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). LAGWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.72 vs. WCMLX (5.89). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 23.35 vs. LAGWX (-2.39).
| LAGWX | WCMLX | LAGWX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.99 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.79 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.004 | 7.621 | 158% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.11B | 45.2M | 4,666% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.72 | 5.89 | 284% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.25 | 29.59 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.39 | 23.35 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.83 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement