Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAGWX vs WCMLX
LAGWX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LAGWX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth A
Price$22.00
Change+$0.33 (+1.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.40
Change+$0.16 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.48M
LAGWX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAGWX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAGWX is a Hold and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAGWX has more cash in the bank: 1.91B vs. WCMLX (41.5M). LAGWX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: LAGWX (0.03) vs WCMLX (0.00). LAGWX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LAGWX (52 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LAGWX (0.94). LAGWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). LAGWX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LAGWX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). LAGWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.68 vs. WCMLX (-0.65). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 22.28 vs. LAGWX (-2.80).
| LAGWX | WCMLX | LAGWX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.99 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.79 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.302 | -4.821 | 68% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.91B | 41.5M | 4,600% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.68 | -0.65 | -875% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.15 | 17.69 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.80 | 22.28 | -13% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.80 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement