Ad is loading...
LAGWX vs WCMLX
LAGWX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LAGWX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth A
Price$19.09
Change+$0.20 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.76B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.25
Change-$0.03 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.18M
LAGWX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAGWX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAGWX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAGWX has more cash in the bank: 1.76B vs. WCMLX (40.2M). LAGWX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: LAGWX (0.03) vs WCMLX (0.00). LAGWX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LAGWX (52 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than LAGWX (0.94). LAGWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMLX (48.00). LAGWX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LAGWX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). LAGWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.22 vs. WCMLX (-8.09). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 28.13 vs. LAGWX (2.82).
| LAGWX | WCMLX | LAGWX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.99 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.86 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.815 | -12.519 | 118% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.76B | 40.2M | 4,388% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.22 | -8.09 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.78 | 0.72 | 249% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.82 | 28.13 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.14 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers