Ad is loading...
LAGWX vs WCMLX
LAGWX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LAGWX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth A
Price$17.85
Change-$1.08 (-5.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.78B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$10.81
Change-$0.86 (-7.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.58M
LAGWX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAGWX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAGWX is a Hold and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAGWX has more cash in the bank: 1.78B vs. WCMLX (41.6M). LAGWX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: LAGWX (0.03) vs WCMLX (0.00). LAGWX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LAGWX (52 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than LAGWX (0.94). LAGWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMLX (48.00). LAGWX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LAGWX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). LAGWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.40 vs. WCMLX (-9.95). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 62.99 vs. LAGWX (25.73).
| LAGWX | WCMLX | LAGWX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.99 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.86 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.529 | -9.253 | 168% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.78B | 41.6M | 4,269% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.40 | -9.95 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.42 | -6.42 | 209% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.73 | 62.99 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.01 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...