Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAGWX vs WCMLX
LAGWX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LAGWX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth A
Price$26.13
Change+$0.24 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.04B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.00
Change+$0.08 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.19M
LAGWX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAGWX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAGWX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAGWX has more cash in the bank: 2.05B vs. WCMLX (44.2M). LAGWX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: LAGWX (0.02) vs WCMLX (0.00). LAGWX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LAGWX (52 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LAGWX (0.94). LAGWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). LAGWX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LAGWX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). LAGWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.84 vs. WCMLX (-0.21). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 3.70 vs. LAGWX (-6.89).
| LAGWX | WCMLX | LAGWX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.99 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.79 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.600 | 8.865 | 187% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 44.2M | 4,627% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.84 | -0.21 | -3,667% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.09 | 28.68 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.89 | 3.70 | -186% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.17 | N/A | - |