Ad is loading...
LAMFX vs VITSX
LAMFX vs VITSX Comparison
Open Charts LAMFX vs VITSX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth F
Price$21.92
Change+$0.05 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.99B
Vanguard Total Stock Market Idx I
Price$131.83
Change+$0.88 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7T
LAMFX vs VITSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMFX vs. VITSX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMFX is a Buy and VITSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VITSX has more cash in the bank: 1.7T vs. LAMFX (3.99B). VITSX pays higher dividends than LAMFX: VITSX (1.36) vs LAMFX (0.80). LAMFX was incepted earlier than VITSX: LAMFX (18 years) vs VITSX (28 years). LAMFX (0.75) is less costly to investors than VITSX (0.03). LAMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VITSX (2.00). LAMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VITSX: LAMFX (0) vs VITSX (5000000). VITSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.69 vs. LAMFX (6.30). VITSX return over 5 years is better than : 91.94 vs. LAMFX (60.98).
| LAMFX | VITSX | LAMFX / VITSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.03 | 2,167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.03 | 2,500% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.606 | -6.507 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.99B | 1.7T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.36 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.30 | 8.69 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.35 | 29.73 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.98 | 91.94 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.03 | 156.95 | 38% |