Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAMGX vs NRGSX
LAMGX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts LAMGX vs NRGSX
Lord Abbett Micro Cap Growth A
Price$19.03
Change+$0.19 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets191.35M
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$60.43
Change+$0.04 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.19B
LAMGX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMGX vs. NRGSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMGX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.19B vs. LAMGX (191M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than LAMGX: NRGSX (0.07) vs LAMGX (0.00). LAMGX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: LAMGX (26 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). LAMGX (1.38) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). LAMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAMGX: NRGSX (0) vs LAMGX (1500). LAMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.84 vs. NRGSX (-14.62). LAMGX return over 5 years is better than : -7.56 vs. NRGSX (-11.01).
| LAMGX | NRGSX | LAMGX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 0.74 | 186% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 0.74 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.045 | -7.590 | -93% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 191M | 8.19B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.84 | -14.62 | -60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.60 | -4.10 | -991% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.56 | -11.01 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.34 | 3.70 | 334% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement