Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAMGX vs NRGSX
LAMGX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts LAMGX vs NRGSX
LAMGX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMGX vs. NRGSX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMGX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 7.53B vs. LAMGX (213M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than LAMGX: NRGSX (0.45) vs LAMGX (0.00). LAMGX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: LAMGX (26 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). LAMGX (1.37) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). LAMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. NRGSX (23.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAMGX: NRGSX (0) vs LAMGX (1500). LAMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.58 vs. NRGSX (-3.03). LAMGX return over 5 years is better than : 27.79 vs. NRGSX (-21.75).
| LAMGX | NRGSX | LAMGX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.74 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.74 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.577 | 13.305 | 185% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 213M | 7.53B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.45 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.58 | -3.03 | -1,437% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.16 | -1.68 | -3,821% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.79 | -21.75 | -128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.92 | 13.23 | 611% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers