Advertisement
LAMR vs PW
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMR is a Hold and PW is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LAMR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LAMR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LAMR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PW’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LAMR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PW’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
LAMR (@Specialty Telecommunications) experienced а -7.06% price change this week, while PW (@Specialty Telecommunications) price change was +24.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was -1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.02%.
Reported Earning Dates
LAMR is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Telecommunications (-1.04% weekly)Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.
| LAMR | PW | LAMR / PW | |
| Capitalization | 11.6B | 4.92M | 236,012% |
| EBITDA | 1.07B | -19.64M | -5,460% |
| Gain YTD | -2.950 | 9.023 | -33% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.80 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 2.21B | 3M | 73,775% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 2.02M | - |
| Total Debt | 1.36B | 38.3M | 3,559% |
LAMR | PW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 25 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 37 Fair valued | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 27 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 15 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LAMR's Valuation (37) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PW (77). This means that LAMR’s stock grew somewhat faster than PW’s over the last 12 months.
LAMR's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for PW (100). This means that LAMR’s stock grew significantly faster than PW’s over the last 12 months.
LAMR's SMR Rating (27) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for PW (100). This means that LAMR’s stock grew significantly faster than PW’s over the last 12 months.
PW's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as LAMR (61). This means that PW’s stock grew similarly to LAMR’s over the last 12 months.
LAMR's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PW (99). This means that LAMR’s stock grew somewhat faster than PW’s over the last 12 months.
| LAMR | PW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 68% | 6 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 9 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 80% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BUFQ | 34.02 | 0.02 | +0.06% |
| FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF | |||
| AAPR | 27.54 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| Innovator Eq Dfnd Prot ETF 2 YrToApl2026 | |||
| APOC | 25.73 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
| Innovator Eq Dfnd Prt ETF - 6 Mo Apr/Oct | |||
| KBUF | 31.33 | -0.13 | -0.43% |
| KraneShares 90% KWEB Dfnd Outcm Jan27ETF | |||
| VALQ | 62.12 | -0.43 | -0.69% |
| American Century® U.S. Quality Value ETF | |||
LAMR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAMR has been closely correlated with OUT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LAMR jumps, then OUT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LAMR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAMR | 100% | -0.45% | ||
| OUT - LAMR | 80% Closely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| DBRG - LAMR | 67% Closely correlated | +3.60% | ||
| AKR - LAMR | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| KIM - LAMR | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| FRT - LAMR | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.16% | ||
More | ||||